These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28712346)

  • 1. A model averaging approach for estimating propensity scores by optimizing balance.
    Xie Y; Zhu Y; Cotton CA; Wu P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):84-101. PubMed ID: 28712346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of confounding adjustment methods with an application to early life determinants of childhood obesity.
    Li L; Kleinman K; Gillman MW
    J Dev Orig Health Dis; 2014 Dec; 5(6):435-47. PubMed ID: 25171142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment.
    Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using a monotone single-index model to stabilize the propensity score in missing data problems and causal inference.
    Qin J; Yu T; Li P; Liu H; Chen B
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(8):1442-1458. PubMed ID: 30566258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variance estimation for stratified propensity score estimators.
    Williamson EJ; Morley R; Lucas A; Carpenter JR
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1617-32. PubMed ID: 22362427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of two methods of estimating propensity scores after multiple imputation.
    Mitra R; Reiter JP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):188-204. PubMed ID: 22687877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.
    Choi BY; Wang CP; Gelfond J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1120-1133. PubMed ID: 32716126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiply robust estimation of causal quantile treatment effects.
    Xie Y; Cotton C; Zhu Y
    Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(28):4238-4251. PubMed ID: 32857876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metrics for covariate balance in cohort studies of causal effects.
    Franklin JM; Rassen JA; Ackermann D; Bartels DB; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(10):1685-99. PubMed ID: 24323618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating propensity scores with missing covariate data using general location mixture models.
    Mitra R; Reiter JP
    Stat Med; 2011 Mar; 30(6):627-41. PubMed ID: 21337358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Stuart EA; Lee BK; Leacy FP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S84-S90.e1. PubMed ID: 23849158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating causal effects for survival (time-to-event) outcomes by combining classification tree analysis and propensity score weighting.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 24(2):380-387. PubMed ID: 29230910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parametric and nonparametric propensity score estimation in multilevel observational studies.
    Salditt M; Nestler S
    Stat Med; 2023 Oct; 42(23):4147-4176. PubMed ID: 37532119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propensity score analysis with local balance.
    Li Y; Li L
    Stat Med; 2023 Jul; 42(15):2637-2660. PubMed ID: 37012676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding and diagnosing the potential for bias when using machine learning methods with doubly robust causal estimators.
    Bahamyirou A; Blais L; Forget A; Schnitzer ME
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1637-1650. PubMed ID: 29717941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.
    Schuler MS; Rose S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27941068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Propensity Score-Based Estimators With Multiple Error-Prone Covariates.
    Hong H; Aaby DA; Siddique J; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):222-230. PubMed ID: 30358801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing approaches to causal inference for longitudinal data: inverse probability weighting versus propensity scores.
    Ertefaie A; Stephens DA
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 14. PubMed ID: 21969998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.