384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28712625)
1. Impact of Survey Administration Mode on the Results of a Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiment: Online and Paper Comparison.
Determann D; Lambooij MS; Steyerberg EW; de Bekker-Grob EW; de Wit GA
Value Health; 2017; 20(7):953-960. PubMed ID: 28712625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What health plans do people prefer? The trade-off between premium and provider choice.
Determann D; Lambooij MS; de Bekker-Grob EW; Hayen AP; Varkevisser M; Schut FT; Wit GA
Soc Sci Med; 2016 Sep; 165():10-18. PubMed ID: 27485728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PROM Validation Using Paper-Based or Online Surveys: Data Collection Methods Affect the Sociodemographic and Health Profile of the Sample.
Rowen D; Carlton J; Elliott J
Value Health; 2019 Aug; 22(8):845-850. PubMed ID: 31426923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment.
Bech M; Kjaer T; Lauridsen J
Health Econ; 2011 Mar; 20(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 20143304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Preferences and Data Quality between Discrete Choice Experiments Conducted in Online and Face-to-Face Respondents.
Jiang R; Pullenayegum E; Shaw JW; Mühlbacher A; Lee TA; Walton S; Kohlmann T; Norman R; Pickard AS
Med Decis Making; 2023 Aug; 43(6):667-679. PubMed ID: 37199407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mobilising the Next Generation of Stated-Preference Studies: the Association of Access Device with Choice Behaviour and Data Quality.
Vass CM; Boeri M
Patient; 2021 Jan; 14(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 33355916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study.
Mauz E; Hoffmann R; Houben R; Krause L; Kamtsiuris P; Gößwald A
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e64. PubMed ID: 29506967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing internet and face-to-face surveys as methods for eliciting preferences for social care-related quality of life: evidence from England using the ASCOT service user measure.
Saloniki EC; Malley J; Burge P; Lu H; Batchelder L; Linnosmaa I; Trukeschitz B; Forder J
Qual Life Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2207-2220. PubMed ID: 30945131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do preferences differ based on respondent experience of a health issue and its treatment? A case study using a public health intervention.
Mott DJ; Ternent L; Vale L
Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Apr; 24(3):413-423. PubMed ID: 35716317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care.
Zuidgeest M; Hendriks M; Koopman L; Spreeuwenberg P; Rademakers J
J Med Internet Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):e68. PubMed ID: 21946048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How Should Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States?
Mulhern B; Norman R; Shah K; Bansback N; Longworth L; Viney R
Med Decis Making; 2018 Apr; 38(3):306-318. PubMed ID: 29084472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states.
Norman R; Cronin P; Viney R
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Jun; 11(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 23649892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using a discrete choice experiment to elicit time trade-off and willingness-to-pay amounts for influenza health-related quality of life at different ages.
Prosser LA; Payne K; Rusinak D; Shi P; Messonnier M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Apr; 31(4):305-15. PubMed ID: 23512145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Modes of Administration and Alternative Formats for Eliciting Societal Preferences for Burden of Illness.
Rowen D; Brazier J; Keetharuth A; Tsuchiya A; Mukuria C
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Feb; 14(1):89-104. PubMed ID: 26445967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mode and Frame Matter: Assessing the Impact of Survey Mode and Sample Frame in Choice Experiments.
Watson V; Porteous T; Bolt T; Ryan M
Med Decis Making; 2019 Oct; 39(7):827-841. PubMed ID: 31524051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Binary choice health state valuation and mode of administration: head-to-head comparison of online and CAPI.
Mulhern B; Longworth L; Brazier J; Rowen D; Bansback N; Devlin N; Tsuchiya A
Value Health; 2013; 16(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 23337221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer.
Howard K; Salkeld G
Value Health; 2009; 12(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 18657102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What Do Patients Want from Otolaryngologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment.
Naunheim MR; Rathi VK; Naunheim ML; Alkire BC; Lam AC; Song PC; Shrime MG
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Oct; 157(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 28675119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
