These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28712801)
1. The Effect of Pelvic Tilt and Femoral Head Size on Hip Range-of-Motion to Impingement. McCarthy TF; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Alipit V; Wagner TC; Mont MA J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3544-3549. PubMed ID: 28712801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acetabular Cup Anteversion and Inclination in Hip Range of Motion to Impingement. McCarthy TF; Alipit V; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Mont MA J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):264-8. PubMed ID: 27067753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Range of Motion to Impingement Curves Create a New Patient-Specific Impingement-Free Zone for Acetabular Cup Placement. McCarthy TF; Thompson MT; Nevelos J; Salem HS; Naylor BH; Mont MA Surg Technol Int; 2021 May; 38():400-406. PubMed ID: 33565600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Small Random Angular Variations in Pelvic Tilt and Lower Extremity Can Cause Error in Static Image-based Preoperative Hip Arthroplasty Planning: A Computer Modeling Study. Eslam Pour A; Lazennec JY; Patel KP; Anjaria MP; Beaulé PE; Schwarzkopf R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Apr; 480(4):818-828. PubMed ID: 35014975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Modeling Study of a Patient-specific Safe Zone for THA: Calculation, Validation, and Key Factors Based on Standing and Sitting Sagittal Pelvic Tilt. Tang H; Li Y; Zhou Y; Wang S; Zhao Y; Ma Z Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jan; 480(1):191-205. PubMed ID: 34495893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components. Widmer KH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of posterior pelvic tilt on anterior instability in total hip arthroplasty: a parametric experimental modeling evaluation. Sato T; Nakashima Y; Matsushita A; Fujii M; Iwamoto Y Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2013 Feb; 28(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 23312621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hip Abduction Can Be Considered the Sole Posterior Precaution Strategy to Lower the Rate of Impingement After Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty With Large Femoral Head: A Computer Simulation Study. Eslam Pour A; Tung WS; Donnelley CA; Tommasini SM; Wiznia DH J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7):1385-1391. PubMed ID: 36709882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?]. Widmer KH Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Even the Intraoperative Knowledge of Femoral Stem Anteversion Cannot Prevent Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Weber M; Woerner ML; Sendtner E; Völlner F; Grifka J; Renkawitz TF J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2514-2519. PubMed ID: 27236745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How much change in pelvic sagittal tilt can result in hip dislocation due to prosthetic impingement? A computer simulation study. Pour AE; Schwarzkopf R; Patel KPK; Anjaria MP; Lazennec JY; Dorr LD J Orthop Res; 2021 Dec; 39(12):2604-2614. PubMed ID: 33749925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spinopelvic Motion and Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty. McKnight BM; Trasolini NA; Dorr LD J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S53-S56. PubMed ID: 30773360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The optimal combined anteversion pattern to achieve a favorable impingement-free angle in total hip arthroplasty. Ohmori T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Inoue D; Taga T; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Yoshitani J; Ueno T; Ueoka K; Tsuchiya H J Orthop Sci; 2019 May; 24(3):474-481. PubMed ID: 30554937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The association between Femoral Tilt and impingement-free range-of-motion in total hip arthroplasty. Renkawitz T; Haimerl M; Dohmen L; Gneiting S; Lechler P; Woerner M; Springorum HR; Weber M; Sussmann P; Sendtner E; Grifka J BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 May; 13():65. PubMed ID: 22559740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of changes in pelvic tilt on range of motion to impingement and radiographic parameters of acetabular morphologic characteristics. Ross JR; Nepple JJ; Philippon MJ; Kelly BT; Larson CM; Bedi A Am J Sports Med; 2014 Oct; 42(10):2402-9. PubMed ID: 25060073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-Dimensional Functional Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Analysis. Debbi EM; Quevedo González FJ; Jerabek SA; Wright TM; Vigdorchik JM J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S678-S684. PubMed ID: 35271980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A forty millimetre head significantly improves range of motion compared with a twenty eight millimetre head in total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system. Tsuda K; Haraguchi K; Koyanagi J; Takahashi S; Sugama R; Fujiwara K Int Orthop; 2016 Oct; 40(10):2031-2039. PubMed ID: 26780716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. Widmer KH; Zurfluh B J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can a Computational Model Predict the Effect of Lesion Location on Cam-type Hip Impingement? Jones AC; Stewart TD; Maher N; Holton C Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Jul; 481(7):1432-1443. PubMed ID: 36724209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]