These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2871284)
1. Severely handicapped babies and the law. Brahams D Lancet; 1986 Apr; 1(8487):984-5. PubMed ID: 2871284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: an analysis. Crossley MA Med Law; 1987; 6(6):499-524. PubMed ID: 2959834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe. Paige C; Karnofsky EB J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):255-69. PubMed ID: 3745839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Handicapped infants: medical ethics and the law. Raphael DD J Med Ethics; 1988 Mar; 14(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 2965246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal aspects of withholding treatment from handicapped newborns: substantive issues. Robertson JA J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):215-30. PubMed ID: 3745837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Severely handicapped infants with life-threatening conditions: federal intrusions into the decision not to treat. Huefner DS Am J Law Med; 1986; 12(2):171-205. PubMed ID: 2964778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting the case of Baby Jane Doe. Kerr K Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Aug; 14(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 6237076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Putting hospitals on notice. Fost N Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Aug; 12(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 6215343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Disconnecting the Baby Doe hotline. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Jun; 13(3):14-6. PubMed ID: 6224760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates. Gostin L Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The case of Baby Jane Doe. 2. Baby Jane Doe in the courts. Steinbock B Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Feb; 14(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 6232243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bioethical considerations in the care of handicapped newborns. Devlin D; Magrab PR J Pediatr Psychol; 1981 Jun; 6(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 6454772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed dissent: the views of some mothers of severely mentally handicapped young adults. Simms M J Med Ethics; 1986 Jun; 12(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 2942689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Right to life of handicapped. Davis A J Med Ethics; 1983 Sep; 9(3):181. PubMed ID: 6225872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Life-prolonging and life-terminating treatment of severely handicapped newborn babies: a discussion of the Report of the Royal Dutch Society of Medicine on "Life-Terminating Actions with Incompetent Patients: Part I: Severely Handicapped Newborns". Jochemsen H Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 1399494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Symposium 1: The Arthur case--a proposal for legislation. Brahams D; Brahams M J Med Ethics; 1983 Mar; 9(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 6220153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: a critical essay. Kohrman AF Soc Sci Med; 1985; 20(11):1091-5. PubMed ID: 3161185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Withholding life-sustaining treatment from severely defective newborns: who should decide? Greenstein LJ Med Law; 1987; 6(6):487-97. PubMed ID: 3312908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]