220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28713085)
1. [The dependence of the marginal adaptation of composite fillings in caries cavities of class ii by black, on the state of oral hygiene and intensity of caries].
Павленкова ЕВ; Ткаченко ИМ; Сидорова АИ; Павленко СА
Wiad Lek; 2017; 70(3 pt 2):574-577. PubMed ID: 28713085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
Yengopal V; Harnekar SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD004483. PubMed ID: 27748505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
Lyons K;
N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical pattern of secondary dental caries in relation to tissue defect class and type of filling material].
Krupiński J; Krupińska A; Lejman L; Modelska D; Roterman I; Sciegienny-Malec J; Rutkowska H
Czas Stomatol; 1990 Oct; 43(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 2104302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro Comparative Evaluation of Various Restorative Materials used for restoring Class III Cavities in Deciduous Anterior Teeth: A Clinical Study.
Priyank H; Verma A; Gupta K; Chaudhary E; Khandelwal D; Nihalani S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1022-1026. PubMed ID: 27965491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M; Wilson N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007517. PubMed ID: 19821423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT.
Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A two-year clinical study of light-cured composite and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
Barr-Agholme M; Odén A; Dahllöf G; Modeér T
Dent Mater; 1991 Oct; 7(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 1814768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence and incidence of caries lesions in relation to placement and replacement of fillings: a longitudinal observational radiographic study of an adult Danish population.
Kirkevang LL; Vaeth M; Wenzel A
Caries Res; 2009; 43(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 19439950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Validity of decision criteria for replacement of fillings].
Hannig C; Kupilas FJ; Wolkewitz M; Attin T
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2009; 119(4):328-38. PubMed ID: 19485073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posterior composites: Update on cavities and filling techniques.
Sabbagh J; McConnell RJ; McConnell MC
J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():86-90. PubMed ID: 27889605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reasons for direct restoration failure from childhood to adolescence: A birth cohort study.
Cumerlato CBDF; Demarco FF; Barros AJD; Peres MA; Peres KG; Morales Cascaes A; de Camargo MBJ; da Silva Dos Santos I; Matijasevich A; Corrêa MB
J Dent; 2019 Oct; 89():103183. PubMed ID: 31449840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
