These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28713511)

  • 1. Accuracy of densitometry of two cone beam computed tomography equipment in comparison with computed tomography.
    Haghanifar S; Yousefi S; Moudi E; Abesi F; Bijani A; Moghadamnia AA; Nabahati M
    Electron Physician; 2017 May; 9(5):4384-4390. PubMed ID: 28713511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Hounsfield unit in CT scan with the gray level in cone-beam CT.
    Razi T; Emamverdizadeh P; Nilavar N; Razi S
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2019; 13(3):177-182. PubMed ID: 31857863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of CT-Number and Gray Scale Value of Different Dental Materials and Hard Tissues in CT and CBCT.
    Emadi N; Safi Y; Akbarzadeh Bagheban A; Asgary S
    Iran Endod J; 2014; 9(4):283-6. PubMed ID: 25386210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can gray values derived from CT and cone beam CT estimate new bone formation? An in vivo study.
    Bastami F; Shahab S; Parsa A; Abbas FM; Noori Kooshki MH; Namdari M; Lisar HA; Rafiei T; Fahimipour F; Salehi M; Jafari M
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 22(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 29086089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of MDCT and CBCT in three-dimensional evaluation of the oropharynx morphology.
    Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Aarab G; Forouzanfar T; de Lange J; van der Stelt P; Lobbezoo F; Wolff J
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 28453722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two examples of indication specific radiation dose calculations in dental CBCT and Multidetector CT scanners.
    Stratis A; Zhang G; Lopez-Rendon X; Politis C; Hermans R; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Shaheen E; Bosmans H
    Phys Med; 2017 Sep; 41():71-77. PubMed ID: 28392311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-assisted implant placement. Part I: relationship of radiographic gray density and implant stability.
    Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Avsever H; Özdemir T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Dec; 15(6):893-906. PubMed ID: 22251553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beam hardening artifacts by dental implants: Comparison of cone-beam and 64-slice computed tomography scanners.
    Esmaeili F; Johari M; Haddadi P
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2013 May; 10(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 24019808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How accurate is CBCT in measuring bone density? A comparative CBCT-CT in vitro study.
    Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Pacifici A; Pacifici L; Barbato E
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):471-8. PubMed ID: 23294461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of effective dose for imaging of mandible between multi-detector CT and cone-beam CT.
    Jeong DK; Lee SC; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2012 Jun; 42(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 22783473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional Surface Reconstructions of In vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
    Sang YH; Hu HC; Lu SH; Wu YW; Li WR; Tang ZH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Jun; 129(12):1464-70. PubMed ID: 27270544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An
    Patrick S; Birur NP; Gurushanth K; Raghavan AS; Gurudath S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 28393820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical cone beam computed tomography compared to high-resolution peripheral computed tomography in the assessment of distal radius bone.
    de Charry C; Boutroy S; Ellouz R; Duboeuf F; Chapurlat R; Follet H; Pialat JB
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Oct; 27(10):3073-82. PubMed ID: 27121345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between Hounsfield Unit in CT Scan and Gray Scale in CBCT.
    Razi T; Niknami M; Alavi Ghazani F
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2014; 8(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 25093055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of Volumetric Distortion Artifact in Filled Root Canals Using Different Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Devices.
    Celikten B; Jacobs R; deFaria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Nicolielo LFP; Orhan K
    J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1517-1521. PubMed ID: 28673491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography.
    Men K; Dai J; Chen X; Li M; Zhang K; Huang P
    Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():110-118. PubMed ID: 28410679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1438-42. PubMed ID: 23189294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality.
    Liang X; Jacobs R; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Corpas L; Souza PC; Martens W; Shahbazian M; Alonso A; Lambrichts I
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 19410409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.