These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28714282)

  • 41. Automatic correction of background phase offset in 4D-flow of great vessels and of the heart in MRI using a third-order surface model.
    Craiem D; Pascaner AF; Casciaro ME; Gencer U; Alcibar J; Soulat G; Mousseaux E
    MAGMA; 2019 Dec; 32(6):629-642. PubMed ID: 31230182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Reproducibility study of four-dimensional flow MRI of arterial and portal venous liver hemodynamics: influence of spatio-temporal resolution.
    Stankovic Z; Jung B; Collins J; Russe MF; Carr J; Euringer W; Stehlin L; Csatari Z; Strohm PC; Langer M; Markl M
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Aug; 72(2):477-84. PubMed ID: 24018798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Aortic pulse wave velocity measurements with undersampled 4D flow-sensitive MRI: comparison with 2D and algorithm determination.
    Wentland AL; Wieben O; François CJ; Boncyk C; Munoz Del Rio A; Johnson KM; Grist TM; Frydrychowicz A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Apr; 37(4):853-9. PubMed ID: 23124585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with repaired aortic coarctation: comparison with young healthy volunteers.
    Rengier F; Delles M; Eichhorn J; Azad YJ; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Ley-Zaporozhan J; Dillmann R; Kauczor HU; Unterhinninghofen R; Ley S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Apr; 31(4):823-30. PubMed ID: 25645544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Image-based background phase error correction in 4D flow MRI revisited.
    Busch J; Giese D; Kozerke S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Nov; 46(5):1516-1525. PubMed ID: 28225577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using 4D flow jet shear layer detection for the measurement of valve effective orifice area.
    Garcia J; Markl M; Schnell S; Allen B; Entezari P; Mahadevia R; Chris Malaisrie S; Pibarot P; Carr J; Barker AJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):891-8. PubMed ID: 24865143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Aortic hemodynamics in patients with and without repair of aortic coarctation: in vivo analysis by 4D flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging.
    Frydrychowicz A; Markl M; Hirtler D; Harloff A; Schlensak C; Geiger J; Stiller B; Arnold R
    Invest Radiol; 2011 May; 46(5):317-25. PubMed ID: 21285892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of 2D and 4D Flow MRI in Neonates Without General Anesthesia.
    Sjöberg P; Hedström E; Fricke K; Frieberg P; Weismann CG; Liuba P; Carlsson M; Töger J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Jan; 57(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 35726779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Validation of Numerical Simulations of Thoracic Aorta Hemodynamics: Comparison with In Vivo Measurements and Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis.
    Boccadifuoco A; Mariotti A; Capellini K; Celi S; Salvetti MV
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):688-706. PubMed ID: 30357714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Quantification of wall shear stress in large blood vessels using Lagrangian interpolation functions with cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Cheng CP; Parker D; Taylor CA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 30(8):1020-32. PubMed ID: 12449763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition for compressed sensing reconstruction of magnetic resonance 4D phase contrast blood flow imaging (loSDeCoS 4D-PCI).
    Hutter J; Schmitt P; Aandal G; Greiser A; Forman C; Grimm R; Horneggert J; Maier A
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2013; 16(Pt 1):558-65. PubMed ID: 24505711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Novel insights by 4D Flow imaging on aortic flow physiology after valve-sparing root replacement with or without neosinuses.
    Galea N; Piatti F; Sturla F; Weinsaft JW; Lau C; Chirichilli I; Carbone I; Votta E; Catalano C; De Paulis R; Girardi LN; Redaelli A; Gaudino M;
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Jun; 26(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 29401262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Toward accurate and fast velocity quantification with 3D ultrashort TE phase-contrast imaging.
    Degenhardt K; Schmidt S; Aigner CS; Kratzer FJ; Seiter DP; Mueller M; Kolbitsch C; Nagel AM; Wieben O; Schaeffter T; Schulz-Menger J; Schmitter S
    Magn Reson Med; 2024 May; 91(5):1994-2009. PubMed ID: 38174601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Wall shear stress estimation in the aorta: Impact of wall motion, spatiotemporal resolution, and phase noise.
    Zimmermann J; Demedts D; Mirzaee H; Ewert P; Stern H; Meierhofer C; Menze B; Hennemuth A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 29607574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Age-related changes of shape and flow dynamics in healthy adult aortas: A 4D flow MRI study.
    Callaghan FM; Bannon P; Barin E; Celemajer D; Jeremy R; Figtree G; Grieve SM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jan; 49(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 30102443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. On the impact of vessel wall stiffness on quantitative flow dynamics in a synthetic model of the thoracic aorta.
    Zimmermann J; Loecher M; Kolawole FO; Bäumler K; Gifford K; Dual SA; Levenston M; Marsden AL; Ennis DB
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6703. PubMed ID: 33758315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Phase unwrapping in 4D MR flow with a 4D single-step laplacian algorithm.
    Loecher M; Schrauben E; Johnson KM; Wieben O
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):833-42. PubMed ID: 26417641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Accuracy of blood flow assessment in cerebral arteries with 4D flow MRI: Evaluation with three segmentation methods.
    Dunås T; Holmgren M; Wåhlin A; Malm J; Eklund A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):511-518. PubMed ID: 30637846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Highly accelerated aortic 4D flow MR imaging with variable-density random undersampling.
    Liu J; Dyverfeldt P; Acevedo-Bolton G; Hope M; Saloner D
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 32(8):1012-20. PubMed ID: 24846341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. On the limitations of partial Fourier acquisition in phase-contrast MRI of turbulent kinetic energy.
    Walheim J; Gotschy A; Kozerke S
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Jan; 81(1):514-523. PubMed ID: 30265753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.