These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28714329)

  • 1. Synthetic sutures: Clinical evaluation and future developments.
    Abhari RE; Martins JA; Morris HL; Mouthuy PA; Carr A
    J Biomater Appl; 2017 Sep; 32(3):410-421. PubMed ID: 28714329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advances, challenges, and prospects for surgical suture materials.
    Li Y; Meng Q; Chen S; Ling P; Kuss MA; Duan B; Wu S
    Acta Biomater; 2023 Sep; 168():78-112. PubMed ID: 37516417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bioactive Sutures: A Review of Advances in Surgical Suture Functionalisation.
    Alshomer F; Madhavan A; Pathan O; Song W
    Curr Med Chem; 2017; 24(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 27855619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of absorbable suture materials in head & neck surgery and introduction of monocryl: a new absorbable suture.
    LaBagnara J
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1995 Jun; 74(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 7628331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Species-dependent premature degradation of absorbable suture materials caused by infection--impact on the choice of thread in vascular surgery.
    Larena-Avellaneda A; Debus ES; Diener H; Dietz UA; Franke S; Thiedel A
    Vasa; 2004 Aug; 33(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 15461069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Rodeheaver GT; Beltran KA; Green CW; Faulkner BC; Stiles BM; Stanimir GW; Traeland H; Fried GM; Brown HC; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Use of absorbable suture material in dermatologic surgery].
    Breuninger H; Haueisen S
    Z Hautkr; 1985 Mar; 60(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 3922138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Biologic tissue response to sutures].
    Marianowski L; Barcz E
    Ginekol Pol; 2004 Jul; 75(7):570-7. PubMed ID: 15517778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved growth with bioabsorbable sutures in both high- and low-pressure zones.
    von Segesser LK; Lachat M; Duewell S; Gianom D; Turina MI
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Oct; 62(4):1045-9; discussion 1049-50. PubMed ID: 8823088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Popularity of suture materials among residents and faculty members of a postdoctoral periodontology program.
    Maksoud M; Koo S; Barouch K; Karimbux N
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Feb; 5(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 23595981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures.
    Justinger C; Slotta JE; Schilling MK
    Surgery; 2012 Mar; 151(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 22088813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Palmar granuloma following flexor tendon repair using Ticron: a case for absorbable suture material?
    Pabari A; Iyer S; Branford OA; Armstrong AP
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Mar; 64(3):409-11. PubMed ID: 20471933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suture materials - Current and emerging trends.
    Dennis C; Sethu S; Nayak S; Mohan L; Morsi YY; Manivasagam G
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2016 Jun; 104(6):1544-59. PubMed ID: 26860644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for repair of achilles tendon rupture with a suture-guiding device.
    Kocaoglu B; Ulku TK; Gereli A; Karahan M; Turkmen M
    Foot Ankle Int; 2015 Jun; 36(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 25941197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is There an Advantage to Knotless Barbed Suture in TKA Wound Closure? A Randomized Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral TKAs.
    Sah AP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2019-27. PubMed ID: 25631171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The properties of damaged and undamaged suture used in metal and bioabsorbable anchors: an in vitro study.
    Wright PB; Budoff JE; Yeh ML; Kelm ZS; Luo ZP
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Jun; 23(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 17560481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recent advances in biodegradable metals for medical sutures: a critical review.
    Seitz JM; Durisin M; Goldman J; Drelich JW
    Adv Healthc Mater; 2015 Sep; 4(13):1915-36. PubMed ID: 26172399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical Outcomes of Bridge-enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Are Influenced by Sex in a Preclinical Model.
    Kiapour AM; Fleming BC; Murray MM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2599-608. PubMed ID: 25742916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study on biocompatibility and absorption times of three absorbable monofilament suture materials (Polydioxanone, Poliglecaprone 25, Glycomer 631).
    Molea G; Schonauer F; Bifulco G; D'Angelo D
    Br J Plast Surg; 2000 Mar; 53(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 10878837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture made from polytrimethylene carbonate.
    Katz AR; Mukherjee DP; Kaganov AL; Gordon S
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Sep; 161(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 3898441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.