These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28715429)

  • 21. Pedestrian crossing behaviors at uncontrolled multi-lane mid-block crosswalks in developing world.
    Zhang C; Zhou B; Qiu TZ; Liu S
    J Safety Res; 2018 Feb; 64():145-154. PubMed ID: 29636163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Can automated driving prevent crashes with distracted Pedestrians? An exploration of motion planning at unsignalized Mid-block crosswalks.
    Zhu H; Han T; Alhajyaseen WKM; Iryo-Asano M; Nakamura H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Aug; 173():106711. PubMed ID: 35598396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A novel model for real-time risk evaluation of vehicle-pedestrian interactions at intersections.
    Wang T; Ge YE; Wang Y; Chen W; Fu Q; Niu Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Oct; 206():107727. PubMed ID: 39079443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vehicle yielding probability estimation model at unsignalized midblock crosswalks in Shanghai, China.
    Malenje JO; Zhao J; Li P; Han Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213876. PubMed ID: 30870520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How Do Human-Driven Vehicles Avoid Pedestrians in Interactive Environments? A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Sun S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z; Deng P; Tian K; Wei C
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pedestrian gestures increase driver yielding at uncontrolled mid-block road crossings.
    Zhuang X; Wu C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Sep; 70():235-44. PubMed ID: 24821628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An accelerated failure time model for investigating pedestrian crossing behavior and waiting times at signalized intersections.
    Yang X; Abdel-Aty M; Huan M; Peng Y; Gao Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Sep; 82():154-62. PubMed ID: 26072184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interactions between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks considering occlusions by opposing vehicles.
    Zhu H; Iryo-Asano M; Alhajyaseen WKM; Nakamura H; Dias C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106468. PubMed ID: 34773785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Social Force Model-Based Safety Evaluation of Intersections in Arterials Considering the Pedestrian Yield Rule.
    Yao J; Li Y; He J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(23):. PubMed ID: 34886182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Investigating pedestrian waiting time at semi-controlled crossing locations: Application of multi-state models for recurrent events analysis.
    Zhang Y; Qiao Y; Fricker JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 137():105437. PubMed ID: 32036105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The link between built environment, pedestrian activity and pedestrian-vehicle collision occurrence at signalized intersections.
    Miranda-Moreno LF; Morency P; El-Geneidy AM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Sep; 43(5):1624-34. PubMed ID: 21658488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Gap acceptance probability model for pedestrians at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks based on logistic regression.
    Zhao J; Malenje JO; Tang Y; Han Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():76-83. PubMed ID: 31128443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Traffic and Environmental Cues and Slow-Down Behaviors in Virtual Driving.
    Hsu CC; Chuang KH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2016 Feb; 122(1):101-22. PubMed ID: 27420310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating pedestrian vehicle interaction dynamics at un-signalized intersections: A proactive approach for safety analysis.
    Kathuria A; Vedagiri P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jan; 134():105316. PubMed ID: 31677475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pedestrian injury patterns and risk in minibus collisions in China.
    Li K; Fan X; Yin Z
    Med Sci Monit; 2015 Mar; 21():727-34. PubMed ID: 25754962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of the Effect of Human-Machine Co-Driving Vehicle on Pedestrian Crossing Speed at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Road Sections: A VR-Based Case Study.
    Wang K; Xu L; Jiang H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 35742456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of Pedestrian Crossing Behavior Based on Surveillance Video.
    Zhou X; Ren H; Zhang T; Mou X; He Y; Chan CY
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Features of pedestrian behavior in car-to-pedestrian contact situations in near-miss incidents in Japan.
    Matsui Y; Hitosugi M; Doi T; Oikawa S; Takahashi K; Ando K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14 Suppl():S58-63. PubMed ID: 23905703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do detection-based warning strategies improve vehicle yielding behavior at uncontrolled midblock crosswalks?
    Hussain Q; Alhajyaseen WKM; Pirdavani A; Brijs K; Shaaban K; Brijs T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106166. PubMed ID: 33962351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Simulation of pedestrian evacuation route choice using social force model in large-scale public space: Comparison of five evacuation strategies.
    Zhou J; Guo Y; Dong S; Zhang M; Mao T
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221872. PubMed ID: 31490974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.