These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28715673)

  • 21. Using Bayesian networks to track DNA movement through complex transfer scenarios.
    Taylor D; Samie L; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():69-80. PubMed ID: 31234042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.
    Hicks T; Biedermann A; de Koeijer JA; Taroni F; Champod C; Evett IW
    Sci Justice; 2015 Dec; 55(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 26654089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bloodstain pattern analysis & Bayes: A case report.
    Meijrink L; van der Scheer M; Kokshoorn B
    Sci Justice; 2023 Jul; 63(4):551-561. PubMed ID: 37453788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An LR framework incorporating sensitivity analysis to model multiple direct and secondary transfer events on skin surface.
    Gill P; Bleka Ø; Roseth A; Fonneløp AE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102509. PubMed ID: 33930816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Who Packed the Drugs? Application of Bayesian Networks to Address Questions of DNA Transfer, Persistence, and Recovery from Plastic Bags and Tape.
    Fonneløp AE; Faria S; Shanthan G; Gill P
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 35052357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of relatives on the likelihood ratio associated with DNA profile evidence in criminal cases.
    Brookfield JF
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1994; 34(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 7931134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stabbing simulations and DNA transfer.
    Samie L; Hicks T; Castella V; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():73-80. PubMed ID: 26875110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Global survey on evaluative reporting on DNA evidence with regard to activity-level propositions.
    Prinz M; Pirtle D; Oldoni F
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 May; 69(3):798-813. PubMed ID: 38351537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The evaluation of fingermarks given activity level propositions.
    de Ronde A; Kokshoorn B; de Poot CJ; de Puit M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109904. PubMed ID: 31472445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Probabilistically determining the cellular source of DNA derived from differential extractions in sexual assault scenarios.
    Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():124-135. PubMed ID: 27388428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.
    Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Determining the optimal forensic DNA analysis procedure following investigation of sample quality.
    Hedell R; Hedman J; Mostad P
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 Jul; 132(4):955-966. PubMed ID: 28717961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of Forensic DNA Traces When Propositions of Interest Relate to Activities: Analysis and Discussion of Recurrent Concerns.
    Biedermann A; Champod C; Jackson G; Gill P; Taylor D; Butler J; Morling N; Hicks T; Vuille J; Taroni F
    Front Genet; 2016; 7():215. PubMed ID: 28018424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Addressing uncertain assumptions in DNA evidence evaluation.
    Kruijver M; Kelly H; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Sep; 66():102913. PubMed ID: 37453205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Helping formulate propositions in forensic DNA analysis.
    Buckleton J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Evett I; Hicks T; Jackson G; Curran JM
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 25002042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Helping to distinguish primary from secondary transfer events for trace DNA.
    Taylor D; Biedermann A; Samie L; Pun KM; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():155-177. PubMed ID: 28273508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Guiding proposition setting in forensic DNA interpretation.
    Buckleton J; Kalafut T; Curran J
    Sci Justice; 2022 Sep; 62(5):540-546. PubMed ID: 36336447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Could Secondary DNA Transfer Falsely Place Someone at the Scene of a Crime?
    Cale CM; Earll ME; Latham KE; Bush GL
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jan; 61(1):196-203. PubMed ID: 26331369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interpretation of a paint cross-transfer on a burglary scene - A case report.
    Vanneste F; Lim-Hitchings YC; Massonnet G; Lunstroot K
    Sci Justice; 2024 May; 64(3):258-263. PubMed ID: 38735660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recent misconceptions about the 'database search problem': a probabilistic analysis using Bayesian networks.
    Biedermann A; Gittelson S; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Oct; 212(1-3):51-60. PubMed ID: 21664776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.