179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28715712)
1. Propriospinal cutaneous-induced EMG suppression is unaltered by anodal tDCS of healthy motor cortex.
McCambridge AB; Stinear JW; Peek S; Byblow WD
Clin Neurophysiol; 2017 Sep; 128(9):1608-1616. PubMed ID: 28715712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation suppresses ipsilateral projections to presumed propriospinal neurons of the proximal upper limb.
Bradnam LV; Stinear CM; Byblow WD
J Neurophysiol; 2011 May; 105(5):2582-9. PubMed ID: 21389299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of anodal tDCS on lumbar propriospinal system in healthy subjects.
Roche N; Lackmy A; Achache V; Bussel B; Katz R
Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 May; 123(5):1027-34. PubMed ID: 22014699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anodal Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation Reduces Facilitation of Propriospinal Neurons in Healthy Humans.
Chothia M; Doeltgen S; Bradnam LV
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(3):364-371. PubMed ID: 26849999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 'I-wave' Recruitment Determines Response to tDCS in the Upper Limb, but Only So Far.
McCambridge AB; Stinear JW; Byblow WD
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1124-9. PubMed ID: 26294062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A dissociation between propriospinal facilitation and inhibition after bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation.
McCambridge AB; Stinear JW; Byblow WD
J Neurophysiol; 2014 Jun; 111(11):2187-95. PubMed ID: 24623508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A propriospinal-like contribution to electromyographic responses evoked in wrist extensor muscles by transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex in man.
Mazevet D; Pierrot-Deseilligny E; Rothwell JC
Exp Brain Res; 1996 Jun; 109(3):495-9. PubMed ID: 8817280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents.
Moliadze V; Schmanke T; Andreas S; Lyzhko E; Freitag CM; Siniatchkin M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 126(7):1392-9. PubMed ID: 25468234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability.
Ataoglu EE; Caglayan HB; Cengiz B
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 28577024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differential effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal, motor and somatosensory cortices on cortical excitability and pain perception - a double-blind randomised sham-controlled study.
Vaseghi B; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 42(7):2426-37. PubMed ID: 26275236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhanced motor learning with bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation: Impact of polarity or current flow direction?
Naros G; Geyer M; Koch S; Mayr L; Ellinger T; Grimm F; Gharabaghi A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Apr; 127(4):2119-26. PubMed ID: 26818881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.
Laczó B; Antal A; Rothkegel H; Paulus W
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 24576783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.
Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of anodal-tDCS on cross-limb transfer in older adults.
Goodwill AM; Daly RM; Kidgell DJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Nov; 126(11):2189-97. PubMed ID: 25732105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Polarity-independent effects of tDCS on paired associative stimulation-induced plasticity.
Faber H; Opitz A; Müller-Dahlhaus F; Ziemann U
Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(6):1061-1069. PubMed ID: 28822654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No significant effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) found on simple motor reaction time comparing 15 different simulation protocols.
Horvath JC; Carter O; Forte JD
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():544-552. PubMed ID: 27664296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural correlates of unihemispheric and bihemispheric motor cortex stimulation in healthy young adults.
Lindenberg R; Sieg MM; Meinzer M; Nachtigall L; Flöel A
Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():141-9. PubMed ID: 26851696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corticomotor excitability induced by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with and without non-exhaustive movement.
Miyaguchi S; Onishi H; Kojima S; Sugawara K; Tsubaki A; Kirimoto H; Tamaki H; Yamamoto N
Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 1529():83-91. PubMed ID: 23891715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of simultaneous bilateral tDCS of the human motor cortex.
Mordillo-Mateos L; Turpin-Fenoll L; Millán-Pascual J; Núñez-Pérez N; Panyavin I; Gómez-Argüelles JM; Botia-Paniagua E; Foffani G; Lang N; Oliviero A
Brain Stimul; 2012 Jul; 5(3):214-222. PubMed ID: 21782545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
