These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28716718)

  • 1. Multivariate pattern analysis of MEG and EEG: A comparison of representational structure in time and space.
    Cichy RM; Pantazis D
    Neuroimage; 2017 Sep; 158():441-454. PubMed ID: 28716718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.
    Sharon D; Hämäläinen MS; Tootell RB; Halgren E; Belliveau JW
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 17532230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interaction between Scene and Object Processing Revealed by Human fMRI and MEG Decoding.
    Brandman T; Peelen MV
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(32):7700-7710. PubMed ID: 28687603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Similarity-Based Fusion of MEG and fMRI Reveals Spatio-Temporal Dynamics in Human Cortex During Visual Object Recognition.
    Cichy RM; Pantazis D; Oliva A
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Aug; 26(8):3563-3579. PubMed ID: 27235099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Face-selective responses in combined EEG/MEG recordings with fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS).
    Hauk O; Rice GE; Volfart A; Magnabosco F; Ralph MAL; Rossion B
    Neuroimage; 2021 Nov; 242():118460. PubMed ID: 34363957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tracking the Spatiotemporal Neural Dynamics of Real-world Object Size and Animacy in the Human Brain.
    Khaligh-Razavi SM; Cichy RM; Pantazis D; Oliva A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 30(11):1559-1576. PubMed ID: 29877767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resolving human object recognition in space and time.
    Cichy RM; Pantazis D; Oliva A
    Nat Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 17(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 24464044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Source estimates for MEG/EEG visual evoked responses constrained by multiple, retinotopically-mapped stimulus locations.
    Hagler DJ; Halgren E; Martinez A; Huang M; Hillyard SA; Dale AM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1290-309. PubMed ID: 18570197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI.
    Klamer S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Erb M; Scheffler K; Focke NK
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Jan; 28(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25296614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A visual encoding model links magnetoencephalography signals to neural synchrony in human cortex.
    Kupers ER; Benson NC; Winawer J
    Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 245():118655. PubMed ID: 34687857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A three domain covariance framework for EEG/MEG data.
    Roś BP; Bijma F; de Gunst MC; de Munck JC
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():305-15. PubMed ID: 26072253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consistency and similarity of MEG- and fMRI-signal time courses during movie viewing.
    Lankinen K; Saari J; Hlushchuk Y; Tikka P; Parkkonen L; Hari R; Koskinen M
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():361-369. PubMed ID: 29486325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Representational Similarity Analysis of the Dynamics of Object Processing Using Single-Trial EEG Classification.
    Kaneshiro B; Perreau Guimaraes M; Kim HS; Norcia AM; Suppes P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135697. PubMed ID: 26295970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shape-independent object category responses revealed by MEG and fMRI decoding.
    Kaiser D; Azzalini DC; Peelen MV
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Apr; 115(4):2246-50. PubMed ID: 26740535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
    Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
    Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multimodal imaging reveals the spatiotemporal dynamics of recollection.
    Bergström ZM; Henson RN; Taylor JR; Simons JS
    Neuroimage; 2013 Mar; 68():141-53. PubMed ID: 23201363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal properties of shape processing by event-related MEG adaptation.
    Huberle E; Lutzenberger W
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 67():119-26. PubMed ID: 23128078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Random fields--union intersection tests for detecting functional connectivity in EEG/MEG imaging.
    Carbonell F; Worsley KJ; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Sotero RC
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Aug; 30(8):2477-86. PubMed ID: 19184994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Spatiotemporal Neural Dynamics of Object Recognition for Natural Images and Line Drawings.
    Singer JJD; Cichy RM; Hebart MN
    J Neurosci; 2023 Jan; 43(3):484-500. PubMed ID: 36535769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.