1131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28718080)
1. A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.
Ho JR; Woo I; Louie K; Salem W; Jabara SI; Bendikson KA; Paulson RJ; Chung K
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Oct; 34(10):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 28718080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes.
Insogna IG; Lanes A; Lee MS; Ginsburg ES; Fox JH
JAMA; 2021 Jan; 325(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 33433574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fresh embryo transfer after in vitro insemination of fresh vs. cryopreserved anonymous donor oocytes: which has a better live birth rate? A Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System analysis.
Whynott RM; Summers KM; Ball GD; Van Voorhis BJ; Sparks A
Fertil Steril; 2022 Apr; 117(4):803-810. PubMed ID: 35216830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Live birth rates and perinatal outcomes when all embryos are frozen compared with conventional fresh and frozen embryo transfer: a cohort study of 337,148 in vitro fertilisation cycles.
Smith ADAC; Tilling K; Lawlor DA; Nelson SM
BMC Med; 2019 Nov; 17(1):202. PubMed ID: 31718643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oocyte efficiency: does live birth rate differ when analyzing cryopreserved and fresh oocytes on a per-oocyte basis?
Goldman KN; Noyes NL; Knopman JM; McCaffrey C; Grifo JA
Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):712-7. PubMed ID: 23721713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association between outdoor air pollution during in vitro culture and the outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
Wang X; Cai J; Liu L; Jiang X; Li P; Sha A; Ren J
Hum Reprod; 2019 Mar; 34(3):441-451. PubMed ID: 30689907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation during IVF treatment does not increase the risk of preterm delivery compared to the transfer of frozen-thawed embryos in a natural cycle.
Rallis A; Tremellen K
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 53(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 23577787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Live birth and perinatal outcomes using cryopreserved oocytes: an analysis of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority database from 2000 to 2016 using three clinical models.
Mascarenhas M; Mehlawat H; Kirubakaran R; Bhandari H; Choudhary M
Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1416-1426. PubMed ID: 33313698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective pilot study comparing fertilization and embryo development between fresh and vitrified sibling oocytes.
Siano L; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
Conn Med; 2013 Apr; 77(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 23691734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of fetal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies from fresh and cryopreserved/thawed oocytes in the same group of patients.
Levi Setti PE; Albani E; Morenghi E; Morreale G; Delle Piane L; Scaravelli G; Patrizio P
Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):396-401. PubMed ID: 23608156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Difference in birth weight of consecutive sibling singletons is not found in oocyte donation when comparing fresh versus frozen embryo replacements.
Galliano D; Garrido N; Serra-Serra V; Pellicer A
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1411-8.e1-3. PubMed ID: 26363384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is feasible for producing competent oocytes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment, with optimal pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.
Kuang Y; Hong Q; Chen Q; Lyu Q; Ai A; Fu Y; Shoham Z
Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 24161646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Synchronization between embryo development and endometrium is a contributing factor for rescue ICSI outcome.
Ming L; Liu P; Qiao J; Lian Y; Zheng X; Ren X; Huang J; Wu Y
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 May; 24(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 22480904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.
Goldman RH; Racowsky C; Farland LV; Munné S; Ribustello L; Fox JH
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):853-859. PubMed ID: 28166330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. To delay or not to delay a frozen embryo transfer after a failed fresh embryo transfer attempt?
Santos-Ribeiro S; Siffain J; Polyzos NP; van de Vijver A; van Landuyt L; Stoop D; Tournaye H; Blockeel C
Fertil Steril; 2016 May; 105(5):1202-1207.e1. PubMed ID: 26806686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
