These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28718087)

  • 1. Speaking two "Languages" in America: A semantic space analysis of how presidential candidates and their supporters represent abstract political concepts differently.
    Li P; Schloss B; Follmer DJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1668-1685. PubMed ID: 28718087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Feb; 45(2):224-239. PubMed ID: 29985107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Moral-Language Use by U.S. Political Elites.
    Wang SN; Inbar Y
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jan; 32(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 33306432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The discrepancy in the perception of the public-political speech in Croatia.
    Tanta I; Lesinger G
    Coll Antropol; 2014 Mar; 38(1):297-304. PubMed ID: 24851633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The abortion issue in the 1980 elections.
    Granberg D; Burlison J
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(5):231-8. PubMed ID: 6653742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mapping moral language on US presidential primary campaigns reveals rhetorical networks of political division and unity.
    Hackenburg K; Brady WJ; Tsakiris M
    PNAS Nexus; 2023 Jun; 2(6):pgad189. PubMed ID: 37333765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconstruction of the socio-semantic dynamics of political activist Twitter networks-Method and application to the 2017 French presidential election.
    Gaumont N; Panahi M; Chavalarias D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0201879. PubMed ID: 30231018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judging Political Hearts and Minds: How Political Dynamics Drive Social Judgments.
    Cornwell JF; Bajger AT; Higgins ET
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1053-68. PubMed ID: 26068717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From left to right: processing acronyms referring to names of political parties activates spatial associations.
    van Elk M; van Schie HT; Bekkering H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2202-19. PubMed ID: 20680888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual Disgust Trumps Pathogen Disgust in Predicting Voter Behavior During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Billingsley J; Lieberman D; Tybur JM
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918764170. PubMed ID: 29911419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How an election loss leads to a social movement: Reactions to the 2016 U.S. presidential election among liberals predict later collective action and social movement identification.
    Bilali R; Godfrey EB; Freel SH
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):227-247. PubMed ID: 31894871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Obesity Prevalence and Voting Behaviors in the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    An R; Ji M
    Am J Health Behav; 2018 Sep; 42(5):21-31. PubMed ID: 30688638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.
    Raccuia L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163872. PubMed ID: 27732617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When does activism benefit well-being? Evidence from a longitudinal study of Clinton voters in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Dwyer PC; Chang YP; Hannay J; Algoe SB
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221754. PubMed ID: 31487304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Multiple-Matching Perspective on Value Versus Identity: Investigating How Political Ideology and Party Identity Contribute to Citizens' Support for Political Candidates.
    Bai H
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2024 Jan; 50(1):58-77. PubMed ID: 36113113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions.
    Jordan KN; Sterling J; Pennebaker JW; Boyd RL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Feb; 116(9):3476-3481. PubMed ID: 30808741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Symbolic disempowerment and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election: Mental health responses among Latinx and white populations.
    Morey BN; García SJ; Nieri T; Bruckner TA; Link BG
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Nov; 289():114417. PubMed ID: 34656819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voter emotional responses and voting behaviour in the 2020 US presidential election.
    Lench HC; Fernandez L; Reed N; Raibley E; Levine LJ; Salsedo K
    Cogn Emot; 2024 May; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38764190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.