These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28718176)

  • 21. The impact of item clustering on visual search: It all depends on the nature of the visual search.
    Xu Y
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):. PubMed ID: 21177422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Running the figure to the ground: figure-ground segmentation during visual search.
    Ralph BC; Seli P; Cheng VO; Solman GJ; Smilek D
    Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():65-73. PubMed ID: 24582768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Competing Distractors Facilitate Visual Search in Heterogeneous Displays.
    Kong G; Alais D; Van der Burg E
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160914. PubMed ID: 27508298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The relationship between visual search and categorization of own- and other-age faces.
    Craig BM; Lipp OV
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 109(4):736-757. PubMed ID: 29536506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Out of sight, out of mind: Matching bias underlies confirmatory visual search.
    Rajsic J; Taylor JE; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):498-507. PubMed ID: 28000157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What visual information do children and adults consider while switching between tasks? Eye-tracking investigation of cognitive flexibility development.
    Chevalier N; Blaye A; Dufau S; Lucenet J
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jul; 46(4):955-72. PubMed ID: 20604615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnostic parts are not exclusive in the search template for real-world object categories.
    Wurth M; Reeder RR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():11-17. PubMed ID: 30939331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Numerosity estimates for attended and unattended items in visual search.
    Kelley TD; Cassenti DN; Marusich LR; Ghirardelli TG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1336-1351. PubMed ID: 28321798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Top-down guidance of eye movements in conjunction search.
    Anderson GM; Heinke D; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 79():36-46. PubMed ID: 23313416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the temporal relation of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms during guidance of attention.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):640-54. PubMed ID: 19309292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Repetition of distractor sets improves visual search performance in hemispatial neglect.
    Saevarsson S; Jóelsdóttir S; Hjaltason H; Kristjánsson A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):1161-9. PubMed ID: 18068736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Top-Down Processes Override Bottom-Up Interference in the Flanker Task.
    Avital-Cohen R; Tsal Y
    Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 27(5):651-8. PubMed ID: 26993739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. False pop out.
    Orsten-Hooge KD; Portillo MC; Pomerantz JR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1623-33. PubMed ID: 26214500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays.
    Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1886-900. PubMed ID: 16445960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.
    Kadel H; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):736-754. PubMed ID: 28169422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance.
    Levinthal BR; Lleras A
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19146296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance.
    Chen X; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4118-33. PubMed ID: 17005231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Top-down attention affects sequential regularity representation in the human visual system.
    Kimura M; Widmann A; Schröger E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Aug; 77(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 20478347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.