BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28718517)

  • 1. Evaluation of fitting models for prostate tissue characterization using extended-range b-factor diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Langkilde F; Kobus T; Fedorov A; Dunne R; Tempany C; Mulkern RV; Maier SE
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Apr; 79(4):2346-2358. PubMed ID: 28718517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using b values up to 2000 s/mm(2) : correlation with Gleason score and repeatability of region of interest analysis.
    Toivonen J; Merisaari H; Pesola M; Taimen P; Boström PJ; Pahikkala T; Aronen HJ; Jambor I
    Magn Reson Med; 2015 Oct; 74(4):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25329932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Monoexponential, Biexponential, Stretched-Exponential, and Kurtosis Models of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiation of Renal Solid Masses.
    Zhang J; Suo S; Liu G; Zhang S; Zhao Z; Xu J; Wu G
    Korean J Radiol; 2019 May; 20(5):791-800. PubMed ID: 30993930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer: effect of b-value distribution on repeatability and cancer characterization.
    Merisaari H; Toivonen J; Pesola M; Taimen P; Boström PJ; Pahikkala T; Aronen HJ; Jambor I
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1212-1218. PubMed ID: 26220861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grading of Gliomas by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging.
    Bai Y; Lin Y; Tian J; Shi D; Cheng J; Haacke EM; Hong X; Ma B; Zhou J; Wang M
    Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):496-504. PubMed ID: 26230975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population.
    Ding K; Yao Y; Gao Y; Lu X; Chen H; Tang Q; Hua C; Zhou M; Zou X; Yin Q
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():138-146. PubMed ID: 31439233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Discussion of correlation between histogram analysis of quantitative diffusion weighted imaging and Gleason score of prostate cancer].
    Wen R; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 99(11):823-828. PubMed ID: 30893724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Liu X; Zhou L; Peng W; Wang C; Wang H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1318-24. PubMed ID: 23791546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion models for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer with in-bore transrectal MR-guided biopsy as a pathological reference.
    Li C; Chen M; Wan B; Yu J; Liu M; Zhang W; Wang J
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1395-1402. PubMed ID: 29486596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of different mathematical models of diffusion-weighted prostate MR imaging.
    Quentin M; Blondin D; Klasen J; Lanzman RS; Miese FR; Arsov C; Albers P; Antoch G; Wittsack HJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 30(10):1468-74. PubMed ID: 22819178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm2.
    Feng Z; Min X; Margolis DJ; Duan C; Chen Y; Sah VK; Chaudhary N; Li B; Ke Z; Zhang P; Wang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172127. PubMed ID: 28199367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer.
    Shinmoto H; Oshio K; Tanimoto A; Higuchi N; Okuda S; Kuribayashi S; Mulkern RV
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Apr; 27(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 18768281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monoexponential, Biexponential, and stretched-exponential models using diffusion-weighted imaging: A quantitative differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0T.
    Jin YN; Zhang Y; Cheng JL; Zheng DD; Hu Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1461-1467. PubMed ID: 30919518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grading and proliferation assessment of diffuse astrocytic tumors with monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging.
    Zhang J; Chen X; Chen D; Wang Z; Li S; Zhu W
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 109():188-195. PubMed ID: 30527302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: a repeatability study.
    Jambor I; Merisaari H; Taimen P; Boström P; Minn H; Pesola M; Aronen HJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2015 May; 73(5):1988-98. PubMed ID: 25046482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fitting methods for intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of prostate cancer on region of interest level: Repeatability and gleason score prediction.
    Merisaari H; Movahedi P; Perez IM; Toivonen J; Pesola M; Taimen P; Boström PJ; Pahikkala T; Kiviniemi A; Aronen HJ; Jambor I
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Mar; 77(3):1249-1264. PubMed ID: 26924552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of mono-exponential, bi-exponential, kurtosis, and fractional-order calculus models of diffusion-weighted imaging in characterizing prostate lesions in transition zone.
    Liu G; Lu Y; Dai Y; Xue K; Yi Y; Xu J; Wu D; Wu G
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jun; 46(6):2740-2750. PubMed ID: 33388809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Model selection for high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate.
    Mazaheri Y; Hötker AM; Shukla-Dave A; Akin O; Hricak H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():21-27. PubMed ID: 29031583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology.
    Shan Y; Chen X; Liu K; Zeng M; Zhou J
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Oct; 44(10):3441-3452. PubMed ID: 31144091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.