206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28718751)
1. Aging Strikes the Self-Face Advantage in Featural Processing.
Qian H; Wang Z; Yan L; Gao X
Exp Aging Res; 2017; 43(4):379-390. PubMed ID: 28718751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
Keyes H
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inverted, Upright, and Blurred Faces Are Not Immune to the Attentional Blink.
Eagles S; Murphy K
Perception; 2016 Aug; 45(8):893-909. PubMed ID: 27060179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing.
Mondloch CJ; Le Grand R; Maurer D
Perception; 2002; 31(5):553-66. PubMed ID: 12044096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aging faces and aging perceivers: young and older adults are less sensitive to deviations from normality in older than in young adult faces.
Short LA; Mondloch CJ
Perception; 2013; 42(8):795-812. PubMed ID: 24303745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces.
Goffaux V; Hault B; Michel C; Vuong QC; Rossion B
Perception; 2005; 34(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15773608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Featural versus configural face processing in a rare genetic disorder: Williams syndrome.
Isaac L; Lincoln A
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2011 Nov; 55(11):1034-42. PubMed ID: 21554469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D faces are recognized more accurately and faster than 2D faces, but with similar inversion effects.
Eng ZHD; Yick YY; Guo Y; Xu H; Reiner M; Cham TJ; Chen SHA
Vision Res; 2017 Sep; 138():78-85. PubMed ID: 28687329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding the role of configural processing in face emotion recognition in Parkinson's disease.
Cousins R; Pettigrew A; Ferrie O; Hanley JR
J Neuropsychol; 2021 Apr; 15 Suppl 1():8-26. PubMed ID: 32323929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When feature information comes first! Early processing of inverted faces.
Carbon CC; Leder H
Perception; 2005; 34(9):1117-34. PubMed ID: 16245489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Featural and configural face processing in adults and infants: a behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.
Scott LS
Perception; 2006; 35(8):1107-28. PubMed ID: 17076069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Double dissociation of configural and featural face processing on P1 and P2 components as a function of spatial attention.
Wang H; Guo S; Fu S
Psychophysiology; 2016 Aug; 53(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 27167853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it!
Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Not all faces are processed equally: evidence for featural rather than holistic processing of one's own face in a face-imaging task.
Greenberg SN; Goshen-Gottstein Y
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):499-508. PubMed ID: 19271862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Features are also important: contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition.
Cabeza R; Kato T
Psychol Sci; 2000 Sep; 11(5):429-33. PubMed ID: 11228917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Faces elicit different scanning patterns depending on task demands.
Boutet I; Lemieux CL; Goulet MA; Collin CA
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1050-1063. PubMed ID: 28185225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
