These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28718751)

  • 21. The face of aging: sensitivity to facial feature relations changes with age.
    Murray JE; Halberstadt J; Ruffman T
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Dec; 25(4):846-50. PubMed ID: 20677879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Configural and featural face processing are differently modulated by attentional resources at early stages: an event-related potential study with rapid serial visual presentation.
    Wang H; Sun P; Ip C; Zhao X; Fu S
    Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 1602():75-84. PubMed ID: 25601005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The face inversion effect--parts and wholes: individual features and their configuration.
    Civile C; McLaren RP; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):728-46. PubMed ID: 24063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Configural but Not Featural Face Information Is Associated With Automatic Processing.
    Wang H; Chen E; Li J; Ji F; Lian Y; Fu S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():884823. PubMed ID: 35496070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Motion facilitates face perception across changes in viewpoint and expression in older adults.
    Maguinness C; Newell FN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2266-80. PubMed ID: 25328999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Natural experience modulates the processing of older adult faces in young adults and 3-year-old children.
    Proietti V; Pisacane A; Macchi Cassia V
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57499. PubMed ID: 23460867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Two routes to face perception: evidence from psychophysics and computational modeling.
    Schwaninger A; Lobmaier JS; Wallraven C; Collishaw S
    Cogn Sci; 2009 Nov; 33(8):1413-40. PubMed ID: 21585511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cultural Differences in the Time Course of Configural and Featural Processing for Own-race Faces.
    Wang H; Qiu R; Li W; Li S; Fu S
    Neuroscience; 2020 Oct; 446():157-170. PubMed ID: 32891705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Own-Age Bias and Positivity Effects in Facial Recognition.
    Denkinger B; Kinn M
    Exp Aging Res; 2018; 44(5):411-426. PubMed ID: 30285572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interfering with memory for faces: The cost of doing two things at once.
    Wammes JD; Fernandes MA
    Memory; 2016; 24(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 25621412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tolerance to spatial-relational transformations in unfamiliar faces: A further challenge to a configural processing account of identity recognition.
    Lorenzino M; Caminati M; Caudek C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():25-38. PubMed ID: 29807303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Lobmaier JS; Klaver P; Loenneker T; Martin E; Mast FW
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 18303568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Older adults' configural processing of faces: role of second-order information.
    Chaby L; Narme P; George N
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Mar; 26(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 20973603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spatial Mechanisms within the Dorsal Visual Pathway Contribute to the Configural Processing of Faces.
    Zachariou V; Nikas CV; Safiullah ZN; Gotts SJ; Ungerleider LG
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Aug; 27(8):4124-4138. PubMed ID: 27522076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?
    Collishaw SM; Hole GJ
    Perception; 2002; 31(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 11954691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of geometric distortions on face-recognition performance.
    Hole GJ; George PA; Eaves K; Rasek A
    Perception; 2002; 31(10):1221-40. PubMed ID: 12430949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.
    Freire A; Lee K; Symons LA
    Perception; 2000; 29(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10820599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Featural, configural, and holistic face-processing strategies evoke different scan patterns.
    Bombari D; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Perception; 2009; 38(10):1508-21. PubMed ID: 19950482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hey baby, what's "up"? One- and 3-month-olds experience faces primarily upright but non-upright faces offer the best views.
    Sugden NA; Moulson MC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):959-969. PubMed ID: 26912287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.