These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28718930)

  • 61. Molecular dynamics simulations using temperature-enhanced essential dynamics replica exchange.
    Kubitzki MB; de Groot BL
    Biophys J; 2007 Jun; 92(12):4262-70. PubMed ID: 17384062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparison between self-guided Langevin dynamics and molecular dynamics simulations for structure refinement of protein loop conformations.
    Olson MA; Chaudhury S; Lee MS
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Nov; 32(14):3014-22. PubMed ID: 21793008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A Kepler Workflow Tool for Reproducible AMBER GPU Molecular Dynamics.
    Purawat S; Ieong PU; Malmstrom RD; Chan GJ; Yeung AK; Walker RC; Altintas I; Amaro RE
    Biophys J; 2017 Jun; 112(12):2469-2474. PubMed ID: 28636905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Heterogeneous CPU+GPU-Enabled Simulations for DFTB Molecular Dynamics of Large Chemical and Biological Systems.
    Allec SI; Sun Y; Sun J; Chang CA; Wong BM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 May; 15(5):2807-2815. PubMed ID: 30916958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Gro2mat: a package to efficiently read gromacs output in MATLAB.
    Dien H; Deane CM; Knapp B
    J Comput Chem; 2014 Jul; 35(20):1528-31. PubMed ID: 24920464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Efficient estimation of binding free energies between peptides and an MHC class II molecule using coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations with a weighted histogram analysis method.
    Huang M; Huang W; Wen F; Larson RG
    J Comput Chem; 2017 Sep; 38(23):2007-2019. PubMed ID: 28660628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. ST-analyzer: a web-based user interface for simulation trajectory analysis.
    Jeong JC; Jo S; Wu EL; Qi Y; Monje-Galvan V; Yeom MS; Gorenstein L; Chen F; Klauda JB; Im W
    J Comput Chem; 2014 May; 35(12):957-63. PubMed ID: 24638223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD.
    Phillips JC; Braun R; Wang W; Gumbart J; Tajkhorshid E; Villa E; Chipot C; Skeel RD; Kalé L; Schulten K
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Dec; 26(16):1781-802. PubMed ID: 16222654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Analyzing the robustness of the MM/PBSA free energy calculation method: application to DNA conformational transitions.
    Brice AR; Dominy BN
    J Comput Chem; 2011 May; 32(7):1431-40. PubMed ID: 21284003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Exploring biomolecular dynamics and interactions using advanced sampling methods.
    Luitz M; Bomblies R; Ostermeir K; Zacharias M
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2015 Aug; 27(32):323101. PubMed ID: 26194626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. PUPIL: A Software Integration System for Multi-Scale QM/MM-MD Simulations and Its Application to Biomolecular Systems.
    Torras J; Roberts BP; Seabra GM; Trickey SB
    Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol; 2015; 100():1-31. PubMed ID: 26415839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Tackling the conformational sampling of larger flexible compounds and macrocycles in pharmacology and drug discovery.
    Chen IJ; Foloppe N
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2013 Dec; 21(24):7898-920. PubMed ID: 24184215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Enhanced conformational sampling using replica exchange with concurrent solute scaling and hamiltonian biasing realized in one dimension.
    Yang M; Huang J; MacKerell AD
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2855-67. PubMed ID: 26082676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Scalable molecular dynamics on CPU and GPU architectures with NAMD.
    Phillips JC; Hardy DJ; Maia JDC; Stone JE; Ribeiro JV; Bernardi RC; Buch R; Fiorin G; Hénin J; Jiang W; McGreevy R; Melo MCR; Radak BK; Skeel RD; Singharoy A; Wang Y; Roux B; Aksimentiev A; Luthey-Schulten Z; Kalé LV; Schulten K; Chipot C; Tajkhorshid E
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Jul; 153(4):044130. PubMed ID: 32752662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. MDBenchmark: A toolkit to optimize the performance of molecular dynamics simulations.
    Gecht M; Siggel M; Linke M; Hummer G; Köfinger J
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Oct; 153(14):144105. PubMed ID: 33086826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Smart resolution replica exchange: an efficient algorithm for exploring complex energy landscapes.
    Liu P; Voth GA
    J Chem Phys; 2007 Jan; 126(4):045106. PubMed ID: 17286516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Use of multistate Bennett acceptance ratio method for free-energy calculations from enhanced sampling and free-energy perturbation.
    Matsunaga Y; Kamiya M; Oshima H; Jung J; Ito S; Sugita Y
    Biophys Rev; 2022 Dec; 14(6):1503-1512. PubMed ID: 36659993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. GPU computing for systems biology.
    Dematté L; Prandi D
    Brief Bioinform; 2010 May; 11(3):323-33. PubMed ID: 20211843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. MDMS: Molecular Dynamics Meta-Simulator for evaluating exchange type sampling methods.
    Smith DB; Okur A; Brooks B
    Chem Phys Lett; 2012 Aug; 545():118-124. PubMed ID: 23087450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Haptic-driven, interactive drug design: implementing a GPU-based approach to evaluate the induced fit effect.
    Anthopoulos A; Pasqualetto G; Grimstead I; Brancale A
    Faraday Discuss; 2014; 169():323-42. PubMed ID: 25340878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.