131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28720225)
1. [Ultrasound screening for birth defects: A medico-economic review].
Ferrier C; Dhombres F; Guilbaud L; Durand-Zaleski I; Jouannic JM
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017; 45(7-8):408-415. PubMed ID: 28720225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: a systematic review of studies of cost and cost effectiveness.
Roberts T; Henderson J; Mugford M; Bricker L; Neilson J; Garcia J
BJOG; 2002 Jan; 109(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11843373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis: polemics around routine ultrasound screening for second trimester fetal malformations.
Levi S
Prenat Diagn; 2002 Apr; 22(4):285-95. PubMed ID: 11981909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The possibility of discovering congenital defects before birth by means of prenatal ultrasound screening].
Jørgensen C
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Nov; 164(48):5603-7. PubMed ID: 12523002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduced costs of congenital anomalies from fetal ultrasound: are they sufficient to justify routine screening in the United States?
Waitzman NJ; Romano PS
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Jun; 847():141-53. PubMed ID: 9668707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Choosing options for ultrasound screening in pregnancy and comparing cost effectiveness: a decision analysis approach.
Roberts T; Mugford M; Piercy J
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Sep; 105(9):960-70. PubMed ID: 9763046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Routine examination by ultrasound for the detection of fetal malformations in a low risk population.
Brocks V; Bang J
Fetal Diagn Ther; 1991; 6(1-2):37-45. PubMed ID: 1768345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.
Chitayat D; Langlois S; Douglas Wilson R; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):736-750. PubMed ID: 21749752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Economic evaluation of ultrasound screening options for structural fetal malformations.
Vanara F; Bergeretti F; Gaglioti P; Todros T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 24(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 15517556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasound screening for fetal structural anomalies.
Gomez KJ; Copel JA
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 5(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 8490090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Report of the French Comité national technique de l'échographie de dépistage prénatal (CNTEDP)--Recommendations for second line prenatal ultrasound].
Viossat P; Ville Y; Bessis R; Jeny R; Nisand I; Teurnier F; Coquel P; Lansac J
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Jan; 42(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 24398021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a report from the Helsinki ultrasound trial.
Leivo T; Tuominen R; Saari-Kemppainen A; Ylöstalo P; Karjalainen O; Heinonen OP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 7(5):309-14. PubMed ID: 8774094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Ultrasound screening and diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities between 11-14 gestational weeks].
Markov D; Chernev T; Dimitrova V; Mazneĭkova V; Leroy Y; Jacquemyn Y; Ramaekers P; Van Bulck B; Loquet P
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2004; 43(3):3-10. PubMed ID: 15341249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies in southern Sweden: a population-based study.
Nikkilä A; Rydhstroem H; Källén B; Jörgensen C
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):688-93. PubMed ID: 16752260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prenatal screening of congenital heart disease between ethics and cost-effectiveness. Time for a change in current prenatal ultrasound screening policies?
Paladini D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 10586471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Screening of congenital anomalies in the mid-trimester of pregnancy. Prospective epidemiologic study. Developmental anomalies].
Tóth-Pál E; Papp C; Tóth Z; Szabó M; Veress L; Török O; Papp Z
Orv Hetil; 1993 Oct; 134(43):2355-60. PubMed ID: 8233453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Ultrasound screening of malformations in pregnancy--a high forensic risk?].
Merz E
Ultraschall Med; 1999 Oct; 20(5):175-6. PubMed ID: 10595384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound Study: another perspective.
DeVore GR
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):622-6. PubMed ID: 8090403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increasing detection rates of birth defects by prenatal ultrasound leading to apparent increasing prevalence. Lessons learned from the population-based registry of birth defects of Barcelona.
Salvador J; Borrell A; Lladonosa A
Prenat Diagn; 2005 Nov; 25(11):991-6. PubMed ID: 16231328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Nuchal translucency measurement--non invasive ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities. Part II].
Sieroszewski P; Baś-Budecka E
Ginekol Pol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 15181876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
