These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle. Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Genomic Selection Models to Predict Flowering Time and Spike Grain Number in Two Hexaploid Wheat Doubled Haploid Populations. Thavamanikumar S; Dolferus R; Thumma BR G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Jul; 5(10):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26206349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation. Nishio M; Satoh M Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):32. PubMed ID: 25928098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marker-based estimation of heritability in immortal populations. Kruijer W; Boer MP; Malosetti M; Flood PJ; Engel B; Kooke R; Keurentjes JJ; van Eeuwijk FA Genetics; 2015 Feb; 199(2):379-98. PubMed ID: 25527288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction accuracies for growth and wood attributes of interior spruce in space using genotyping-by-sequencing. Gamal El-Dien O; Ratcliffe B; Klápště J; Chen C; Porth I; El-Kassaby YA BMC Genomics; 2015 May; 16(1):370. PubMed ID: 25956247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix. Tiezzi F; Maltecca C Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population. Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. Muir WM J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of QTL minor allele frequency on genomic evaluation using real genotype data and simulated phenotypes in Japanese Black cattle. Uemoto Y; Sasaki S; Kojima T; Sugimoto Y; Watanabe T BMC Genet; 2015 Nov; 16():134. PubMed ID: 26586567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of whole-genome prediction using a genetic architecture-enhanced variance-covariance matrix. Zhang Z; Erbe M; He J; Ober U; Gao N; Zhang H; Simianer H; Li J G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Feb; 5(4):615-27. PubMed ID: 25670771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of the optimal number of markers and individuals in a training population necessary for maximum prediction accuracy in F Peixoto LA; Bhering LL; Cruz CD Genet Mol Res; 2016 Nov; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27886337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]