These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28721527)

  • 1. FESEM evaluation of smear layer removal using different irrigant activation methods (EndoActivator, EndoVac, PUI and LAI). An in vitro study.
    Mancini M; Cerroni L; Iorio L; Dall'Asta L; Cianconi L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):993-999. PubMed ID: 28721527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.
    Mancini M; Cerroni L; Iorio L; Armellin E; Conte G; Cianconi L
    J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1456-60. PubMed ID: 24139274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.
    Urban K; Donnermeyer D; Schäfer E; Bürklein S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Dec; 21(9):2681-2687. PubMed ID: 28185091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Using Apical Negative Pressure (EndoVac), Sonic Irrigation (EndoActivator) and Er:YAG laser -An
    Suman S; Verma P; Prakash-Tikku A; Bains R; Kumar-Shakya V
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Aug; 9(8):e981-e987. PubMed ID: 28936288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of different final irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal.
    Saber Sel-D; Hashem AA
    J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1272-5. PubMed ID: 21846546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of different final irrigation methods on the removal of calcium hydroxide from an artificial standardized groove in the apical third of root canals.
    Capar ID; Ozcan E; Arslan H; Ertas H; Aydinbelge HA
    J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):451-4. PubMed ID: 24565670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Smear Layer Removal Ability of QMix with Different Activation Techniques.
    Arslan D; Guneser MB; Dincer AN; Kustarci A; Er K; Siso SH
    J Endod; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1279-85. PubMed ID: 27287613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FESEM evaluation of smear layer removal from conservatively shaped canals: laser activated irrigation (PIPS and SWEEPS) compared to sonic and passive ultrasonic activation-an ex vivo study.
    Mancini M; Cerroni L; Palopoli P; Olivi G; Olivi M; Buoni C; Cianconi L
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Feb; 21(1):81. PubMed ID: 33618701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model.
    Andrabi SM; Kumar A; Zia A; Iftekhar H; Alam S; Siddiqui S
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Aug; 5(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 23595996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of different irrigation activation regimens and conventional irrigation techniques for the removal of modified triple antibiotic paste from root canals.
    Akman M; Akbulut MB; Aydınbelge HA; Belli S
    J Endod; 2015 May; 41(5):720-4. PubMed ID: 25747378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Smear Layer Removal and Penetration Depth of Root Canal Irrigant Using Different Irrigation Activation Systems: A Comparative Study.
    Pujari MD; Das M; Das A; Kamath DG; Henry J; Shyam A; Alhaleis DM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Apr; 25(4):331-334. PubMed ID: 38956847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of canal isthmus debridement efficacy of modified EndoVac technique with different irrigation systems.
    Thomas AR; Velmurugan N; Smita S; Jothilatha S
    J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1676-80. PubMed ID: 25052146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of various irrigation activation protocols and the self-adjusting file system on smear layer and debris removal.
    Çapar İD; Aydinbelge HA
    Scanning; 2014; 36(6):640-7. PubMed ID: 25285423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of 3 different irrigation systems on removal of calcium hydroxide from the root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Alturaiki S; Lamphon H; Edrees H; Ahlquist M
    J Endod; 2015 Jan; 41(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 25442071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layer removal from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation.
    Haupt F; Meinel M; Gunawardana A; Hülsmann M
    Aust Endod J; 2020 Apr; 46(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 30907051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Qualitative analysis of the removal of the smear layer in the apical third of curved roots: conventional irrigation versus activation systems.
    Blank-Gonçalves LM; Nabeshima CK; Martins GH; Machado ME
    J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1268-71. PubMed ID: 21846545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of final irrigant protocols for debris removal from simulated canal irregularities.
    Martins Justo A; Abreu da Rosa R; Santini MF; Cardoso Ferreira MB; Pereira JR; Húngaro Duarte MA; Reis Só MV
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2009-14. PubMed ID: 25266470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of different sonic activation protocols on debridement efficacy in teeth with single-rooted canals.
    Niu LN; Luo XJ; Li GH; Bortoluzzi EA; Mao J; Chen JH; Gutmann JL; Pashley DH; Tay FR
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1001-9. PubMed ID: 24878251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Smear layer removal with passive ultrasonic irrigation and the NaviTip FX: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Goel S; Tewari S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 19576804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.