These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2872192)

  • 1. Doing something about "bad doctors".
    Freidheim JE
    IMJ Ill Med J; 1986 May; 169(5):257. PubMed ID: 2872192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medicolegal Sidebar: Peer Review of Professional Competence.
    Brenner L; Teo W; Bal S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 May; 478(5):958-960. PubMed ID: 32287108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physicians in distress.
    Goodman RS; London SK
    N Y State J Med; 1993 Mar; 93(3):200-1. PubMed ID: 8455855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Legislation passed in 1987 may offer hospitals, HMOs protection from litigation.
    Kenkel PJ
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Dec; 19(48):34. PubMed ID: 10296453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dealing with the bad medical result.
    Ohio Med; 1988 Oct; 84(10):840. PubMed ID: 3226680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How much malpractice can be blamed on bad doctors?
    Thomas MC
    Med Econ; 1988 Apr; 65(8):51-3, 56, 58-63. PubMed ID: 10286896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Malpractice--listening to the voices.
    Sandroni S
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1986 May; 73(5):373-4. PubMed ID: 3723095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuing controversy: doctors vs. lawyers.
    Dykers JR
    N C Med J; 1994 Apr; 55(4):107-8. PubMed ID: 8008073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Malpractice: living with the threat.
    Connelly JE
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1988; 51(3):26-9. PubMed ID: 3174824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding the competence review process.
    Keenan R
    Nurs N Z; 2006 Oct; 12(9):26-7. PubMed ID: 17112077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are the best doctors sued more?
    Oppenheim EB
    J Fam Pract; 1999 May; 48(5):387-8. PubMed ID: 10334616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consultations and risks of malpractice.
    Ohio Med; 1991 Mar; 87(3):141-2. PubMed ID: 2030885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Big mouths cause malpractice suits.
    Bradford EW
    Indiana Med; 1986 May; 79(5):452-4. PubMed ID: 3722802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. National Practitioner Data Bank: the toy of the imperial Congress. When bad things happen to good doctors.
    Gale AH
    Mo Med; 1992 Oct; 89(10):720-6. PubMed ID: 1491664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two feet of mistakes. Medicine: How to police serious errors by doctors?
    Miller S
    Newsweek; 1995 Mar; 125(13):60. PubMed ID: 10141393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Continuing controversy: doctors vs. lawyers.
    Bean GO
    N C Med J; 1994 Apr; 55(4):108. PubMed ID: 8008074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Issues in medical malpractice XV.
    Tan SY
    Hawaii Med J; 2007 Sep; 66(9):250. PubMed ID: 20879471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Malpractice databank: a crackdown on incompetence.
    Fintor L
    Group Pract J; 1988; 37(2):45, 48. PubMed ID: 10286623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Doctors take the stage.
    Peota C
    Minn Med; 2005 Jun; 88(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 16050296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Jousting--lighting the malpractice fuse.
    Velasco C
    Minn Med; 2007 Aug; 90(8):50-1. PubMed ID: 17899851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.