These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28722243)

  • 1. Differences between Caucasian and Asian attractive faces.
    Rhee SC
    Skin Res Technol; 2018 Feb; 24(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 28722243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Facial Proportions Between Beauty Pageant Contestants and Ordinary Young Women of Korean Ethnicity: A Three-Dimensional Photogrammetric Analysis.
    Kim SC; Kim HB; Jeong WS; Koh KS; Huh CH; Kim HJ; Lee WS; Choi JW
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Jun; 42(3):748-758. PubMed ID: 29380023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models.
    Torsello F; Mirigliani L; D'Alessio R; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20529624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.
    Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The attractive lip: A photomorphometric analysis.
    Penna V; Fricke A; Iblher N; Eisenhardt SU; Stark GB
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jul; 68(7):920-9. PubMed ID: 25921652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Divine proportions in attractive and nonattractive faces.
    Pancherz H; Knapp V; Erbe C; Heiss AM
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 20209174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of facial morphologies between adult Chinese and Houstonian Caucasian populations using three-dimensional imaging.
    Wirthlin J; Kau CH; English JD; Pan F; Zhou H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1100-7. PubMed ID: 23623784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contribution of lip proportions to facial aesthetics in different ethnicities: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Wong WW; Davis DG; Camp MC; Gupta SC
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Dec; 63(12):2032-9. PubMed ID: 20133215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the frontal esthetic preferences in the lower facial portion of Koreans and Caucasians.
    Kang YG; Lee YH; Kook YA; Kim SH; Sinclair PM
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19582252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photogrammetric facial analysis of attractive Korean entertainers.
    Rhee SC; Dhong ES; Yoon ES
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 33(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 19034560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frontal facial analysis of female celebrity attractiveness standards through artificial intelligence.
    Grillo R; Quinta Reis BA; Lima BC; Peral Ferreira Pinto LA; Melhem-Elias F
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 52(6):722-726. PubMed ID: 38580557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of anteroposterior mandibular positions on facial attractiveness in Japanese adults.
    Kuroda S; Sugahara T; Takabatake S; Taketa H; Ando R; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 19121504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A three-dimensional evaluation of Māori and New Zealand European faces.
    Antoun JS; Lawrence C; Leow A; Rongo R; Dias G; Farella M
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 Nov; 30(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 25549519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ideal Facial Relationships and Goals.
    Bueller H
    Facial Plast Surg; 2018 Oct; 34(5):458-465. PubMed ID: 30296797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Morphological quantitative criteria and aesthetic evaluation of eight female Han face types.
    Zhao Q; Zhou R; Zhang X; Sun H; Lu X; Xia D; Song M; Liang Y
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 37(2):445-53. PubMed ID: 23404449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.
    Talbert L; Kau CH; Christou T; Vlachos C; Souccar N
    J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How does variation in lower anterior face height influence perceived attractiveness? A quantitative investigation.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    J Orthod; 2013 Sep; 40(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 24009320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of chinese faces and its application in evaluating facial deformity.
    Dong Y; Zhao Y; Bai S; Wu G; Zhou L; Wang B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1195-206. PubMed ID: 21050632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biometric study of eyelid shape and dimensions of different races with references to beauty.
    Rhee SC; Woo KS; Kwon B
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 36(5):1236-45. PubMed ID: 22810555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.