146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28722695)
1. Cardiac cycle efficiency and dicrotic pressure variations: new parameters for fluid therapy: An observational study.
Messina A; Romano SM; Bonicolini E; Colombo D; Cammarota G; Chiostri M; Della Corte F; Navalesi P; Payen D; Romagnoli S
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Nov; 34(11):755-763. PubMed ID: 28722695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multivariable haemodynamic approach to predict the fluid challenge response: A multicentre cohort study.
Messina A; Romano SM; Ozdemirkan A; Persona P; Tarquini R; Cammarota G; Romagnoli S; Della Corte F; Bennett V; Monge García MI; Cecconi M; Payen D
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2021 Jan; 38(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 32833857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic arterial elastance as a predictor of arterial pressure response to fluid administration: a validation study.
García MI; Romero MG; Cano AG; Aya HD; Rhodes A; Grounds RM; Cecconi M
Crit Care; 2014 Nov; 18(6):626. PubMed ID: 25407570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decrease in pulse pressure and stroke volume variations after mini-fluid challenge accurately predicts fluid responsiveness†.
Mallat J; Meddour M; Durville E; Lemyze M; Pepy F; Temime J; Vangrunderbeeck N; Tronchon L; Thevenin D; Tavernier B
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Sep; 115(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 26152341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic arterial elastance measured with pressure recording analytical method, and mean arterial pressure responsiveness in hypotensive preload dependent patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A prospective cohort study.
Di Tomasso N; Lerose CC; Licheri M; Castro LEA; Tamà S; Vitiello C; Landoni G; Zangrillo A; Monaco F
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2021 Apr; 38(4):402-410. PubMed ID: 33399386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach.
Biais M; Ehrmann S; Mari A; Conte B; Mahjoub Y; Desebbe O; Pottecher J; Lakhal K; Benzekri-Lefevre D; Molinari N; Boulain T; Lefrant JY; Muller L;
Crit Care; 2014 Nov; 18(6):587. PubMed ID: 25658489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Change in cardiac output during Trendelenburg maneuver is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position under protective ventilation.
Yonis H; Bitker L; Aublanc M; Perinel Ragey S; Riad Z; Lissonde F; Louf-Durier A; Debord S; Gobert F; Tapponnier R; Guérin C; Richard JC
Crit Care; 2017 Dec; 21(1):295. PubMed ID: 29208025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery.
Geerts BF; Maas J; de Wilde RB; Aarts LP; Jansen JR
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):802-6. PubMed ID: 21799416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of an automated respiratory systolic variation test with dynamic preload indicators to predict fluid responsiveness after major surgery.
Trepte CJ; Eichhorn V; Haas SA; Stahl K; Schmid F; Nitzschke R; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Nov; 111(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 23811425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pulse pressure variation as a guide for volume expansion in dogs undergoing orthopedic surgery.
Fantoni DT; Ida KK; Gimenes AM; Mantovani MM; Castro JR; Patrício GCF; Ambrósio AM; Otsuki DA
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2017 Jul; 44(4):710-718. PubMed ID: 28734854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A mini-fluid challenge of 150mL predicts fluid responsiveness using Modelflow
Smorenberg A; Cherpanath TGV; Geerts BF; de Wilde RBP; Jansen JRC; Maas JJ; Groeneveld ABJ
J Clin Anesth; 2018 May; 46():17-22. PubMed ID: 29367093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting fluid responsiveness during infrarenal aortic cross-clamping in pigs.
Biais M; Calderon J; Pernot M; Barandon L; Couffinhal T; Ouattara A; Sztark F
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1101-7. PubMed ID: 24060469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hemodynamic Effect of Different Doses of Fluids for a Fluid Challenge: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Study.
Aya HD; Rhodes A; Chis Ster I; Fletcher N; Grounds RM; Cecconi M
Crit Care Med; 2017 Feb; 45(2):e161-e168. PubMed ID: 27655325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of responsiveness to an intravenous fluid challenge in patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between arterial pulse pressure variation and digital plethysmographic variability index.
Fischer MO; Pelissier A; Bohadana D; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL; Fellahi JL
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1087-93. PubMed ID: 23992654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method.
Biais M; Cottenceau V; Stecken L; Jean M; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Sztark F
Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1186-91. PubMed ID: 22425817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pulse Pressure Variation Adjusted by Respiratory Changes in Pleural Pressure, Rather Than by Tidal Volume, Reliably Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Liu Y; Wei LQ; Li GQ; Yu X; Li GF; Li YM
Crit Care Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 26457754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.
Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Jugular vein distensibility predicts fluid responsiveness in septic patients.
Guarracino F; Ferro B; Forfori F; Bertini P; Magliacano L; Pinsky MR
Crit Care; 2014 Dec; 18(6):647. PubMed ID: 25475099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Plethysmography variability index for prediction of fluid responsiveness during graded haemorrhage and transfusion in sevoflurane-anaesthetized mechanically ventilated dogs.
Endo Y; Kawase K; Miyasho T; Sano T; Yamashita K; Muir WW
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2017 Nov; 44(6):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 29113716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.
Muller L; Louart G; Bousquet PJ; Candela D; Zoric L; de La Coussaye JE; Jaber S; Lefrant JY
Intensive Care Med; 2010 Mar; 36(3):496-503. PubMed ID: 19847400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
