193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28723720)
1. Trends in Hysteropexy and Apical Support for Uterovaginal Prolapse in the United States from 2002 to 2012.
Madsen AM; Raker C; Sung VW
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(6):365-371. PubMed ID: 28723720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.
Ross WT; Meister MR; Shepherd JP; Olsen MA; Lowder JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):436.e1-436.e8. PubMed ID: 28716634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends in apical prolapse surgery between 2010 and 2016 in Denmark.
Husby KR; Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):321-327. PubMed ID: 30610266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of High-, Intermediate-, and Low-Volume Surgeons When Performing Hysterectomy for Uterovaginal Prolapse.
Morgan DM; Pulliam S; Adam RA; Swenson C; Guire K; Kamdar N; Guaderrama N
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 26516812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse?
Gutman RE
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27467823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Apical support at the time of hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse.
Kantartzis KL; Turner LC; Shepherd JP; Wang L; Winger DG; Lowder JL
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Feb; 26(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 25182150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Apical Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy for Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Comparative Analysis of 2001 and 2011.
Hudson CO; Karp DR; Loucks TL; Northington GM
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 26506163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nationwide assessment of practice variability in the utilization of hysteropexy at laparoscopic apical suspension for uterine prolapse.
Cox KR; Ferzandi TR; Dancz CE; Mandelbaum RS; Klar M; Wright JD; Matsuo K
AJOG Glob Rep; 2024 Feb; 4(1):100322. PubMed ID: 38586613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse.
Ridgeway BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 213(6):802-9. PubMed ID: 26226554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hysteropexy: Evidence and Insights.
Ridgeway BM; Cadish L
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 60(2):312-323. PubMed ID: 28263199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concomitant apical suspensory procedures in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse in the United States in 2011.
Northington GM; Hudson CO; Karp DR; Huber SA
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Apr; 27(4):613-9. PubMed ID: 26630948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Bradley S; Gutman RE; Richter LA
Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(2):15. PubMed ID: 29476274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practice patterns of general gynecologic surgeons versus gynecologic subspecialists for concomitant apical suspension during vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse.
Yurteri-Kaplan LA; Mete MM; St Clair C; Iglesia CB
South Med J; 2015 Jan; 108(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 25580752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in Patterns of Preoperative Assessment Between High, Intermediate, and Low Volume Surgeons When Performing Hysterectomy for Uterovaginal Prolapse.
Pulliam SJ; Morgan DM; Guaderrama N; Guire K; Adam RA
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 26516806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse.
Korbly NB; Kassis NC; Good MM; Richardson ML; Book NM; Yip S; Saguan D; Gross C; Evans J; Lopes VV; Harvie HS; Sung VW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 209(5):470.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23921090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study.
Rahmanou P; Price N; Jackson SR
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1687-94. PubMed ID: 26142347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regional Performance of Apical Support Procedures at Time of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Is the Role of Surgeon Training?
Putman JG; Meister MR; Lenger SM; Lowder JL
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jul; 27(7):421-426. PubMed ID: 32701766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.
Kapoor S; Sivanesan K; Robertson JA; Veerasingham M; Kapoor V
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 28258346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
