260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28724509)
21. Accuracy of the Multisensory Wristwatch Polar Vantage's Estimation of Energy Expenditure in Various Activities: Instrument Validation Study.
Gilgen-Ammann R; Schweizer T; Wyss T
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Oct; 7(10):e14534. PubMed ID: 31579020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validating Fitbit Zip for monitoring physical activity of children in school: a cross-sectional study.
Mooses K; Oja M; Reisberg S; Vilo J; Kull M
BMC Public Health; 2018 Jul; 18(1):858. PubMed ID: 29996797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validity and Reliability Evaluation of Four Commercial Activity Trackers' Step Counting Performance.
Tophøj KH; Petersen MG; Sæbye C; Baad-Hansen T; Wagner S
Telemed J E Health; 2018 Sep; 24(9):669-677. PubMed ID: 29303680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Validation of the Fitbit One, Garmin Vivofit and Jawbone UP activity tracker in estimation of energy expenditure during treadmill walking and running.
Price K; Bird SR; Lythgo N; Raj IS; Wong JY; Lynch C
J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Apr; 41(3):208-215. PubMed ID: 27919170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validity of Commercial Activity Trackers in Children With Congenital Heart Disease.
Voss C; Gardner RF; Dean PH; Harris KC
Can J Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 33(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 28347581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Measuring reliability and validity of the ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer for children with cerebral palsy: a feasibility study.
O'Neil ME; Fragala-Pinkham MA; Forman JL; Trost SG
J Pediatr Rehabil Med; 2014; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 25260506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Physical Activity Device Reliability and Validity during Pregnancy and Postpartum.
Conway MR; Marshall MR; Schlaff RA; Pfeiffer KA; Pivarnik JM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Mar; 50(3):617-623. PubMed ID: 29077641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points.
Santos-Lozano A; Santín-Medeiros F; Cardon G; Torres-Luque G; Bailón R; Bergmeir C; Ruiz JR; Lucia A; Garatachea N
Int J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 34(11):975-82. PubMed ID: 23700330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparing ActiGraph equations for estimating energy expenditure in older adults.
Aguilar-Farias N; Peeters GMEEG; Brychta RJ; Chen KY; Brown WJ
J Sports Sci; 2019 Jan; 37(2):188-195. PubMed ID: 29912666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site.
Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Shaffer JA; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Automatic Identification of Physical Activity Type and Duration by Wearable Activity Trackers: A Validation Study.
Dorn D; Gorzelitz J; Gangnon R; Bell D; Koltyn K; Cadmus-Bertram L
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 May; 7(5):e13547. PubMed ID: 31124470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validity of Wrist-Wearable Activity Devices for Estimating Physical Activity in Adolescents: Comparative Study.
Hao Y; Ma XK; Zhu Z; Cao ZB
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e18320. PubMed ID: 33410757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Usefulness of Modern Activity Trackers for Monitoring Exercise Behavior in Chronic Cardiac Patients: Validation Study.
Herkert C; Kraal JJ; van Loon EMA; van Hooff M; Kemps HMC
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Dec; 7(12):e15045. PubMed ID: 31855191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the activPAL accelerometer for physical activity and energy expenditure estimation in a semi-structured setting.
Montoye AHK; Pivarnik JM; Mudd LM; Biswas S; Pfeiffer KA
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20(11):1003-1007. PubMed ID: 28483558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Classification Accuracy of a Wearable Activity Tracker for Assessing Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity in 3-5-Year-Old Children.
Byun W; Lee JM; Kim Y; Brusseau TA
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Mar; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29587432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Use of Wearable Activity Trackers Among Older Adults: Focus Group Study of Tracker Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers in the Maintenance Stage of Behavior Change.
Kononova A; Li L; Kamp K; Bowen M; Rikard RV; Cotten S; Peng W
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e9832. PubMed ID: 30950807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improving energy expenditure estimates from wearable devices: A machine learning approach.
O'Driscoll R; Turicchi J; Hopkins M; Horgan GW; Finlayson G; Stubbs JR
J Sports Sci; 2020 Jul; 38(13):1496-1505. PubMed ID: 32252598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Can energy expenditure be accurately assessed using accelerometry-based wearable motion detectors for physical activity monitoring in post-stroke patients in the subacute phase?
Mandigout S; Lacroix J; Ferry B; Vuillerme N; Compagnat M; Daviet JC
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 24(18):2009-2016. PubMed ID: 29067851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Defining Accelerometer Nonwear Time to Maximize Detection of Sedentary Time in Youth.
Cain KL; Bonilla E; Conway TL; Schipperijn J; Geremia CM; Mignano A; Kerr J; Sallis JF
Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2018 May; 30(2):288-295. PubMed ID: 29276859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of Oura ring energy expenditure and steps in laboratory and free-living.
Kristiansson E; Fridolfsson J; Arvidsson D; Holmäng A; Börjesson M; Andersson-Hall U
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):50. PubMed ID: 36829120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
