260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28724509)
41. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?
An HS; Jones GC; Kang SK; Welk GJ; Lee JM
Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Apr; 17(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 27912681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of a Wearable Tracker with Actigraph for Classifying Physical Activity Intensity and Heart Rate in Children.
Kang S; Kim Y; Byun W; Suk J; Lee JM
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jul; 16(15):. PubMed ID: 31349667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Validity of wearable activity monitors for tracking steps and estimating energy expenditure during a graded maximal treadmill test.
Kendall B; Bellovary B; Gothe NP
J Sports Sci; 2019 Jan; 37(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 29863968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Validity, Reliability and Sensitivity to Change of Three Consumer-Grade Activity Trackers in Controlled and Free-Living Conditions among Older Adults.
Kastelic K; Dobnik M; Löfler S; Hofer C; Šarabon N
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 34577457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Intensity classification accuracy of accelerometer-measured physical activities in Chinese children and youth.
Zhu Z; Chen P; Zhuang J
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2013 Dec; 84 Suppl 2():S4-11. PubMed ID: 24527562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Ankle Accelerometry for Assessing Physical Activity Among Adolescent Girls: Threshold Determination, Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility.
Hager ER; Treuth MS; Gormely C; Epps L; Snitker S; Black MM
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2015; 86(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 26288333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparability and feasibility of wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers in free-living adolescents.
Scott JJ; Rowlands AV; Cliff DP; Morgan PJ; Plotnikoff RC; Lubans DR
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28501418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Factors associated with validity of consumer-oriented wearable physical activity trackers: a meta-analysis.
Leung W; Case L; Jung J; Yun J
J Med Eng Technol; 2021 Apr; 45(3):223-236. PubMed ID: 33750250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Calibration of the GENEA accelerometer for assessment of physical activity intensity in children.
Phillips LR; Parfitt G; Rowlands AV
J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Mar; 16(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 22770768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. How Accurate Is Your Activity Tracker? A Comparative Study of Step Counts in Low-Intensity Physical Activities.
Alinia P; Cain C; Fallahzadeh R; Shahrokni A; Cook D; Ghasemzadeh H
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Aug; 5(8):e106. PubMed ID: 28801304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Development and validation of energy expenditure prediction models based on GT3X accelerometer data in 5- to 9-year-old children.
Jimmy G; Seiler R; Maeder U
J Phys Act Health; 2013 Sep; 10(7):1057-67. PubMed ID: 23136371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reliability and Validity of Objective Measures of Physical Activity in Youth With Cerebral Palsy Who Are Ambulatory.
O'Neil ME; Fragala-Pinkham M; Lennon N; George A; Forman J; Trost SG
Phys Ther; 2016 Jan; 96(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 26089043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Criterion Validity of Competing Accelerometry-Based Activity Monitoring Devices.
Kim Y; Welk GJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Nov; 47(11):2456-63. PubMed ID: 25910051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Validity of Accelerometry to Measure Physical Activity Intensity in Children With an Acquired Brain Injury.
Baque E; Sakzewski L; Trost SG; Boyd RN; Barber L
Pediatr Phys Ther; 2017 Oct; 29(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 28953176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Free-living Evaluation of Laboratory-based Activity Classifiers in Preschoolers.
Ahmadi MN; Brookes D; Chowdhury A; Pavey T; Trost SG
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2020 May; 52(5):1227-1234. PubMed ID: 31764460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Validity of Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers for Estimating VO
Passler S; Bohrer J; Blöchinger L; Senner V
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(17):. PubMed ID: 31443347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Validity of hip-mounted uniaxial accelerometry with heart-rate monitoring vs. triaxial accelerometry in the assessment of free-living energy expenditure in young children: the IDEFICS Validation Study.
Ojiambo R; Konstabel K; Veidebaum T; Reilly J; Verbestel V; Huybrechts I; Sioen I; Casajús JA; Moreno LA; Vicente-Rodriguez G; Bammann K; Tubic BM; Marild S; Westerterp K; Pitsiladis YP;
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2012 Nov; 113(10):1530-6. PubMed ID: 22995396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Standardizing Analytic Methods and Reporting in Activity Monitor Validation Studies.
Welk GJ; Bai Y; Lee JM; Godino J; Saint-Maurice PF; Carr L
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2019 Aug; 51(8):1767-1780. PubMed ID: 30913159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Relative validity of 3 accelerometer models for estimating energy expenditure during light activity.
Wetten AA; Batterham M; Tan SY; Tapsell L
J Phys Act Health; 2014 Mar; 11(3):638-47. PubMed ID: 23417054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Concurrent Validity of Wearable Activity Trackers Under Free-Living Conditions.
Brooke SM; An HS; Kang SK; Noble JM; Berg KE; Lee JM
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 27465631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
