These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28725271)

  • 21. Efficacy of plantar loading parameters during gait in terms of reliability, variability, effect of gender and relationship between contact area and plantar pressure.
    Murphy DF; Beynnon BD; Michelson JD; Vacek PM
    Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Feb; 26(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 15737261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sex Differences in Pedobarographic Findings and Relationship between Radiographic and Pedobarographic Measurements in Young Healthy Adults.
    Koo S; Chun S; Lee KM; Cho BC; Koo YJ; Kang DW; Park MS
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2018 Jun; 10(2):216-224. PubMed ID: 29854346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temporal characteristics of foot roll-over during barefoot jogging: reference data for young adults.
    De Cock A; De Clercq D; Willems T; Witvrouw E
    Gait Posture; 2005 Jun; 21(4):432-9. PubMed ID: 15886133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of footprint geometric and plantar loading measurements in children using the Emed(®) M system.
    Tong JW; Kong PW
    Gait Posture; 2013 Jun; 38(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 23266249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of running-induced fatigue on plantar pressure distribution in novice runners with different foot types.
    Anbarian M; Esmaeili H
    Gait Posture; 2016 Jul; 48():52-56. PubMed ID: 27477708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of the dynamic pedobarograph and EMED systems for measuring dynamic foot pressures.
    Quaney B; Meyer K; Cornwall MW; McPoil TG
    Foot Ankle Int; 1995 Sep; 16(9):562-6. PubMed ID: 8563925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of Plantar Pressure Distribution in Relationship to Body Mass Index in Czech Women During Walking.
    Tománková K; Přidalová M; Svoboda Z; Cuberek R
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2017 May; 107(3):208-214. PubMed ID: 28650759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of medial arch support foot orthosis on plantar pressure distribution in females with mild-to-moderate hallux valgus after one month of follow-up.
    Farzadi M; Safaeepour Z; Mousavi ME; Saeedi H
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Apr; 39(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 24515981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability of F-scan in-shoe measurements of plantar pressure.
    Ahroni JH; Boyko EJ; Forsberg R
    Foot Ankle Int; 1998 Oct; 19(10):668-73. PubMed ID: 9801080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of tap dance on plantar pressure, postural stability and lower body function in older patients at risk of diabetic foot: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zhao Y; Cai K; Wang Q; Hu Y; Wei L; Gao H
    BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care; 2021 Mar; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 33737414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reference values of spatiotemporal parameters, joint angles, ground reaction forces, and plantar pressure distribution during normal gait in young women.
    Fryzowicz A; Murawa M; Kabaciński J; Rzepnicka A; Dworak LB
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2018; 20(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 29658524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differences in plantar loading between flat and normal feet during different athletic tasks.
    Queen RM; Mall NA; Nunley JA; Chuckpaiwong B
    Gait Posture; 2009 Jun; 29(4):582-6. PubMed ID: 19157878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy and repeatability of a semi-quantitative barefoot pressure measurement method for clinical use: The Derks Calculation Method.
    Maetzler M; Bochdansky T; Abboud RJ
    Foot (Edinb); 2019 Jun; 39():136-139. PubMed ID: 30928309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigating the dynamic plantar pressure distribution and loading pattern in subjects with multiple sclerosis.
    Keklicek H; Cetin B; Salci Y; Balkan AF; Altinkaynak U; Armutlu K
    Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2018 Feb; 20():186-191. PubMed ID: 29414296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The average pressure distribution of the diabetic foot: can it be used as a clinical diagnostic aid?
    Hayes A; Seitz P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1997 Apr; 12(3):S3-S4. PubMed ID: 11415698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of terrain on foot pressures during walking.
    Mohamed O; Cerny K; Jones W; Burnfield JM
    Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Oct; 26(10):859-69. PubMed ID: 16221460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantitative Analysis of Foot Plantar Pressure During Walking.
    Jasiewicz B; Klimiec E; Młotek M; Guzdek P; Duda S; Adamczyk J; Potaczek T; Piekarski J; Kołaszczyński G
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Jul; 25():4916-4922. PubMed ID: 31266932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long distance running increases plantar pressures beneath the metatarsal heads: a barefoot walking investigation of 200 marathon runners.
    Nagel A; Fernholz F; Kibele C; Rosenbaum D
    Gait Posture; 2008 Jan; 27(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 17276688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of obesity on dynamic plantar pressure distribution in Chinese prepubescent children during walking.
    Yan SH; Zhang K; Tan GQ; Yang J; Liu ZC
    Gait Posture; 2013 Jan; 37(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 22858245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability and limitations of the durometer and PressureStat to measure plantar foot characteristics in Native Americans with diabetes.
    Cuaderes E; Khan MM; Azzarello J; Lamb WL
    J Nurs Meas; 2009; 17(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 19902656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.