184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28725584)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging detection of prostate cancer in men with previous negative prostate biopsy.
Truong M; Frye TP
Transl Androl Urol; 2017 Jun; 6(3):424-431. PubMed ID: 28725584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Additive Value of Transrectal Systematic Ventral Biopsies in Combination with Magnet Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy in Patients with 3 or More Negative Prostate Biopsies.
Maxeiner A; Nest AM; Stephan C; Cash H; Baur ADJ; Fischer T; Kilic E; Piper SK; Nowak CP; Busch J; Miller K; Mang J
Urol Int; 2020; 104(3-4):205-213. PubMed ID: 31801153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is There Still a Need for Repeated Systematic Biopsies in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsies in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies of the Prostate?
Exterkate L; Wegelin O; Barentsz JO; van der Leest MG; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; van Melick HHE; Somford DM
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 3(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 31239236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Targeted multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound-guided (mpMRI/TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy versus systematic random prostate biopsy: A comparative real-life study.
Pham THN; Schulze-Hagen MF; Rahnama'i MS
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2024 Feb; 7(2):e1962. PubMed ID: 38217298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion in Chinese men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen.
Lian H; Zhuang J; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Li D; Fu Y; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
BMC Urol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28679370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.
Wegelin O; Exterkate L; van der Leest M; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; Barentsz JO; Somford DM; van Melick HHE
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):582-590. PubMed ID: 30522912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evolution of Targeted Prostate Biopsy by Adding Micro-Ultrasound to the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pathway.
Wiemer L; Hollenbach M; Heckmann R; Kittner B; Plage H; Reimann M; Asbach P; Friedersdorff F; Schlomm T; Hofbauer S; Cash H
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1292-1299. PubMed ID: 32654967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided and Systematic Biopsy of the Prostate in Biopsy-naïve Patients and Patients with Prior Biopsies.
Preisser F; Theissen L; Wenzel M; Humke C; Bodelle B; Köllermann J; Kluth L; Banek S; Becker A; Roos F; Chun FK; Mandel P
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 31296485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy Compared with Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer.
Alkema NG; Hoogeveen SFJS; Cauberg ECC; Witte LPW; van 't Veer-Ten Kate M; de Boer E; Hoogland MAM; Blanker MH; Boomsma MF; Steffens MG
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Oct; 44():125-130. PubMed ID: 36185584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiparametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing repeat biopsy: a prospective comparison with clinical findings and histopathology.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 28679325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Pathway with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Standard Pathway: Results from a Randomized Prospective Study in Biopsy-naïve Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer.
Porpiglia F; Manfredi M; Mele F; Cossu M; Bollito E; Veltri A; Cirillo S; Regge D; Faletti R; Passera R; Fiori C; De Luca S
Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):282-288. PubMed ID: 27574821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsies vs. systematic prostate biopsies in biopsy-naïve, previous negative biopsy patients and men undergoing active surveillance.
Borghesi M; Bianchi L; Barbaresi U; Vagnoni V; Corcioni B; Gaudiano C; Fiorentino M; Giunchi F; Chessa F; Garofalo M; Bertaccini A; Angelini S; Ercolino A; Casablanca C; Droghetti M; Golfieri R; Schiavina R
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Jun; 73(3):357-366. PubMed ID: 33769008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An initial negative round of targeted biopsies in men with highly suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance findings does not exclude clinically significant prostate cancer-Preliminary experience.
Costa DN; Kay FU; Pedrosa I; Kolski L; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Rofsky NM
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e15-149.e21. PubMed ID: 27939349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the Role of High-resolution Microultrasound Among Naïve Patients with Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a Persistently High Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Avolio PP; Lughezzani G; Fasulo V; Maffei D; Sanchez-Salas R; Paciotti M; Saitta C; De Carne F; Saita A; Hurle R; Lazzeri M; Guazzoni G; Buffi NM; Casale P
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2023 Jan; 47():73-79. PubMed ID: 36601049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
