BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28726340)

  • 1. Factors influencing property selection for conservation revolving funds.
    Hardy MJ; Fitzsimons JA; Bekessy SA; Gordon A
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Apr; 32(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 28726340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maintaining landholder satisfaction and management of private protected areas established under conservation agreements.
    Groce JE; Cook CN
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Mar; 305():114355. PubMed ID: 34953226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of disputes and easement violations on the cost-effectiveness of land conservation.
    Schuster R; Arcese P
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1185. PubMed ID: 26413430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conservation and social outcomes of private protected areas.
    Palfrey R; Oldekop J; Holmes G
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1098-1110. PubMed ID: 33210742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The value of flexibility in conservation financing.
    Lennox GD; Fargione J; Spector S; Williams G; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Jun; 31(3):666-674. PubMed ID: 27273603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using a social-ecological framework to inform the implementation of conservation plans.
    Guerrero AM; Wilson KA
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Apr; 31(2):290-301. PubMed ID: 27601156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Landowner Perceptions of Payments for Nature Conservation on Private Land.
    Yasué M; Kirkpatrick JB; Davison A; Gilfedder L
    Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 64(3):287-302. PubMed ID: 31359092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.
    Larson ER; Howell S; Kareiva P; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):206-15. PubMed ID: 26460820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conservation easements: biodiversity protection and private use.
    Rissman AR; Lozier L; Comendant T; Kareiva P; Kiesecker JM; Shaw MR; Merenlender AM
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Jun; 21(3):709-18. PubMed ID: 17531049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Program Awareness, Social Capital, and Perceptions of Trees Influence Participation in Private Land Conservation Programs in Queensland, Australia.
    Simmons BA; Archibald CL; Wilson KA; Dean AJ
    Environ Manage; 2020 Sep; 66(3):289-304. PubMed ID: 32588074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying trade-offs between ecological gains, economic costs, and landowners' preferences in boreal mire protection.
    Nieminen E; Kareksela S; Halme P; Kotiaho JS
    Ambio; 2021 Oct; 50(10):1841-1850. PubMed ID: 33825157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding variation in impacts from private protected areas across regions and protection mechanisms to inform organizational practices.
    Hagen S; Nolte C; Chang Y; Morgan S; Boccaletti G; Reddy SMW
    Conserv Biol; 2024 Apr; 38(2):e14225. PubMed ID: 38328897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving inferences about private land conservation by accounting for incomplete reporting.
    Williamson MA; Dickson BG; Hooten MB; Graves RA; Lubell MN; Schwartz MW
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1174-1185. PubMed ID: 33319392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The psychological appeal of owning private land for conservation.
    Gooden J; Grenyer R
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):339-350. PubMed ID: 30152551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptions and attitudes of land managers in multi-tenure reserve networks and the implications for conservation.
    Fitzsimons JA; Wescott G
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 84(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 16904814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the shelf life of cost-efficient conservation plans for species at risk across gradients of agricultural land use.
    Robillard CM; Kerr JT
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):837-847. PubMed ID: 27991681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Building robust conservation plans.
    Visconti P; Joppa L
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 25362995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the impact of private land conservation with synthetic control design.
    Sharma R; Jones S; Robinson D; Gordon A
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Dec; 37(6):e14150. PubMed ID: 37461881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Traps and transformations influencing the financial viability of tourism on private-land conservation areas.
    Clements HS; Cumming GS
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Apr; 32(2):424-436. PubMed ID: 28815735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ecological efficiency of voluntary conservation of boreal-forest biodiversity.
    Mönkkönen M; Ylisirniö AL; Hämäläinen T
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 18983601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.