These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28726504)

  • 41. Diagnostic errors in abdominopelvic CT interpretation: characterization based on report addenda.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Bansal NK
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Sep; 41(9):1793-9. PubMed ID: 27108129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Variation in Follow-up Imaging Recommendations in Radiology Reports: Patient, Modality, and Radiologist Predictors.
    Cochon LR; Kapoor N; Carrodeguas E; Ip IK; Lacson R; Boland G; Khorasani R
    Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):700-707. PubMed ID: 31063082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Adding value to imaging services: a survey of patient and referring physician preferences for direct radiologic reporting of results.
    Thai JN; Josemon R; Smith S; Morey J; Sison CP; Landau E; Chaya N; Peti S; Jbara ME; Sarkany D; Raden M; Brenner AI
    Clin Imaging; 2021 May; 73():73-78. PubMed ID: 33316709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Referring physicians' attitudes toward international interpretation of teleradiology images.
    Lester N; Durazzo T; Kaye A; Ahl M; Forman HP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):W1-8. PubMed ID: 17179319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Electronic messaging system for communicating important, but nonemergent, abnormal imaging results.
    Eisenberg RL; Yamada K; Yam CS; Spirn PW; Kruskal JB
    Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):724-31. PubMed ID: 20884911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Itemised or Prose Radiology Reports? A Survey of Referring Physicians' and Radiologists' Preferences.
    Goh LW; Teh HS; Sarmiento AR
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2016 Apr; 45(4):165-8. PubMed ID: 27292008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Strengthening your ties to referring physicians through RIS/PACS integration.
    Worthy S; Rounds KC; Soloway CB
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 12800559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Computed tomography technologist notes in PACS to radiologists: what are they telling us and how does it increase value?
    Jensen CT; Javadi S; Bhosale P; Moawad AW; Saleh M; Ganeshan D; Morani AC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jun; 46(6):2913-2919. PubMed ID: 33550526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Traditional text-only versus multimedia-enhanced radiology reporting: referring physicians' perceptions of value.
    Sadigh G; Hertweck T; Kao C; Wood P; Hughes D; Henry TS; Duszak R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 May; 12(5):519-24. PubMed ID: 25622764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Radiologist as consultant: direct contact between referring clinician and radiologist before CT examination.
    Seltzer SE; Beard JO; Adams DF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Apr; 144(4):661-4. PubMed ID: 3872018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Initial Referring Physician and Radiologist Experience with Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System.
    Bunch PM; Meegalla NT; Abualruz AR; Frizzell BA; Patwa HS; Porosnicu M; Williams DW; Aiken AH; Hughes RT
    Laryngoscope; 2022 Feb; 132(2):349-355. PubMed ID: 34272871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Radiology Report Value Equation.
    Eberhardt SC; Heilbrun ME
    Radiographics; 2018 Oct; 38(6):1888-1896. PubMed ID: 30303791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An evaluation of the impact of clinically embedded reading rooms on radiologist-referring clinician communication.
    Tillack AA; Borgstede JP
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 May; 10(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 23642878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Second-Opinion Subspecialty Consultations in Musculoskeletal Radiology.
    Chalian M; Del Grande F; Thakkar RS; Jalali SF; Chhabra A; Carrino JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1217-21. PubMed ID: 27058462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of a gynecologist-interventional radiologist relationship on selection of treatment modality for the patient with uterine myoma.
    Zurawin RK; Fischer JH; Amir L
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 20226411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Automating radiologist workflow part 1: the digital consultation.
    Reiner B
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Oct; 5(10):1080-5. PubMed ID: 18812153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Medico-legal issues in radiological consultation.
    Mozumdar BC; Jones G
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):40-3. PubMed ID: 14603592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Referring Physicians' Tendency to Collaborate With Radiologists in Managing Contrast Media-Related Risk Factors.
    İmamoğlu H; Doğan S; Erdoğan N
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Feb; 15(2):296-300. PubMed ID: 29102537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Radiologists' responses to patients' inquiries about imaging results. A pilot study on opinions of various groups.
    Song HH; Park SH; Shinn KS
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28(11):1043-8. PubMed ID: 8276576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Time Spent on Dedicated Patient Care and Documentation Tasks Before and After the Introduction of a Structured and Standardized Electronic Health Record.
    Joukes E; Abu-Hanna A; Cornet R; de Keizer NF
    Appl Clin Inform; 2018 Jan; 9(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 29342479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.