These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28727615)

  • 21. Expansion of Severely Constricted Visual Field Using Google Glass.
    Trese MG; Khan NW; Branham K; Conroy EB; Moroi SE
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina; 2016 May; 47(5):486-9. PubMed ID: 27183556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prism therapy and visual rehabilitation in homonymous visual field loss.
    O'Neill EC; Connell PP; O'Connor JC; Brady J; Reid I; Logan P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Feb; 88(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 21217411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative visual fields under binocular viewing conditions in primary and consecutive divergent strabismus.
    Joosse MV; Simonsz HJ; van Minderhout EM; Mulder PG; de Jong PT
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1999 Jul; 237(7):535-45. PubMed ID: 10424303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of high power and angle of incidence on prism corrections for visual field loss.
    Jung JH; Peli E
    Opt Eng; 2014 Jan; 53(6):. PubMed ID: 24497649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pilot study of a pedestrian collision detection test for a multisite trial of field expansion devices for hemianopia.
    Bowers AR; Manda S; Shekar S; Hwang AD; Jung JH; Peli E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2024 Jun; 101(6):408-416. PubMed ID: 38990239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual acuity through fresnel, refractive, and hybrid diffractive/refractive prisms.
    Katz M
    Optometry; 2004 Aug; 75(8):503-8. PubMed ID: 15372787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of visual restitution training on absolute homonymous scotomas.
    Schreiber A; Vonthein R; Reinhard J; Trauzettel-Klosinski S; Connert C; Schiefer U
    Neurology; 2006 Jul; 67(1):143-5. PubMed ID: 16832095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of rates of change between binocular and monocular visual fields.
    Chun YS; Shin JH; Park IK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jan; 56(1):451-7. PubMed ID: 25564449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Community-based trial of a peripheral prism visual field expansion device for hemianopia.
    Bowers AR; Keeney K; Peli E
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2008 May; 126(5):657-64. PubMed ID: 18474776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Residual vision in a scotoma: implications for blindsight.
    Fendrich R; Wessinger CM; Gazzaniga MS
    Science; 1992 Nov; 258(5087):1489-91. PubMed ID: 1439839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The scotogenic contact lens: a novel device for treating binocular diplopia.
    Robert MP; Bonci F; Pandit A; Ferguson V; Nachev P
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 99(8):1022-4. PubMed ID: 25680615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual field defects in children with congenital glaucoma.
    de Souza EC; Berezovsky A; Morales PH; de Arruda Mello PA; de Oliveira Bonomo PP; Salomão SR
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2000; 37(5):266-72. PubMed ID: 11020107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision.
    Jampel HD; Friedman DS; Quigley H; Miller R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1059-67. PubMed ID: 11923247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dichoptic stimulation improves detection of glaucoma with multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Arvind H; Klistorner A; Graham S; Grigg J; Goldberg I; Klistorner A; Billson FA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4590-6. PubMed ID: 17898282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Is it possible to compensate for visual field defects?].
    Lachenmayr B
    Ophthalmologe; 2006 May; 103(5):382-6. PubMed ID: 16283190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identifying Absolute Preferred Retinal Locations during Binocular Viewing.
    Tarita-Nistor L; Eizenman M; Landon-Brace N; Markowitz SN; Steinbach MJ; González EG
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Aug; 92(8):863-72. PubMed ID: 26208024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comparison between binocular and monocular reading ability and its relation with central visual field sensitivity in glaucoma patients].
    Ishii M; Seki M; Harigai R; Abe H; Fukuchi T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Nov; 117(11):925-30. PubMed ID: 24397190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monocular versus binocular vision in postural control.
    Isotalo E; Kapoula Z; Feret PH; Gauchon K; Zamfirescu F; Gagey PM
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2004 Mar; 31(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 15041048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Midline tilting between seeing and nonseeing areas in hemianopia.
    Younge BR
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1976 Sep; 51(9):562-8. PubMed ID: 957792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Suppression scotomas in primary microstrabismus--a perimetric artefact.
    Mehdorn E
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1989 Jan; 71(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 2743853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.