179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28727834)
1. Systematic review: Outcome reporting bias is a problem in high impact factor neurology journals.
Howard B; Scott JT; Blubaugh M; Roepke B; Scheckel C; Vassar M
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180986. PubMed ID: 28727834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review.
Wayant C; Scheckel C; Hicks C; Nissen T; Leduc L; Som M; Vassar M
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178379. PubMed ID: 28570573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selective outcome reporting in obesity clinical trials: a cross-sectional review.
Rankin J; Ross A; Baker J; O'Brien M; Scheckel C; Vassar M
Clin Obes; 2017 Aug; 7(4):245-254. PubMed ID: 28557240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.
Turner L; Shamseer L; Altman DG; Weeks L; Peters J; Kober T; Dias S; Schulz KF; Plint AC; Moher D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):MR000030. PubMed ID: 23152285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions.
Rongen JJ; Hannink G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 26935463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting.
Zhang S; Liang F; Li W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 91():87-94. PubMed ID: 28757260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of consistency between peer-reviewed publications and clinical trial registrations in nursing journals.
Liu HH; Su CX; Li ZQ; Yue SJ; Cheng SH; Peng D
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2023 Dec; 20(6):574-581. PubMed ID: 37005350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Registration rates, adequacy of registration, and a comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials published in surgery journals.
Killeen S; Sourallous P; Hunter IA; Hartley JE; Grady HL
Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):193-6. PubMed ID: 23732270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration.
Scott A; Rucklidge JJ; Mulder RT
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133718. PubMed ID: 26287998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture.
Won J; Kim S; Bae I; Lee H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223305. PubMed ID: 31581278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The heart of the matter: Outcome reporting bias and registration status in cardio-thoracic surgery.
Wiebe J; Detten G; Scheckel C; Gearhart D; Wheeler D; Sanders D; Vassar M
Int J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 227():299-304. PubMed ID: 27839821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discrepancies between Registered and Published Primary and Secondary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials within the Plastic Surgery Literature: A Systematic Review.
Hudson AS; Morzycki AD; Samargandi OA; Williams JG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jan; 145(1):245-255. PubMed ID: 31609284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
Mathieu S; Boutron I; Moher D; Altman DG; Ravaud P
JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(9):977-84. PubMed ID: 19724045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.
Su CX; Han M; Ren J; Li WY; Yue SJ; Hao YF; Liu JP
Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():28. PubMed ID: 25626862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions.
Hannink G; Gooszen HG; Rovers MM
Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 23407296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of selective outcome reporting and trial registration practices among addiction clinical trials.
Vassar M; Roberts W; Cooper CM; Wayant C; Bibens M
Addiction; 2020 Jun; 115(6):1172-1179. PubMed ID: 31743532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.
Dundar Y; Dodd S; Dickson R; Walley T; Haycox A; Williamson PR
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Feb; 10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. PubMed ID: 16487455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Registered and Reported Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Anesthesiology Journals.
Jones PM; Chow JTY; Arango MF; Fridfinnson JA; Gai N; Lam K; Turkstra TP
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 28704247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
