151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28727879)
1. The United Kingdom Sets Limits on Experimental Treatments: The Case of Charlie Gard.
Truog RD
JAMA; 2017 Sep; 318(11):1001-1002. PubMed ID: 28727879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Observations on the case of Charlie Gard.
Lagercrantz H
Arch Dis Child; 2018 May; 103(5):409-410. PubMed ID: 29382638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Charlie Gard and the limits of medicine.
The Lancet
Lancet; 2017 Aug; 390(10094):531. PubMed ID: 28792383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Accountability for rationing--theory into practice.
Newdick C
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(4):660-8. PubMed ID: 16686237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reflections on Charlie Gard and the Best Interests Standard From Both Sides of the Atlantic Ocean.
Ross LF
Pediatrics; 2020 Aug; 146(Suppl 1):S60-S65. PubMed ID: 32737234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The equity of fertility.
Farrell J; Brown J; Szczepanska S; Barber C
Nurs Stand; 2004 Mar 10-16; 18(26):22-3. PubMed ID: 15052756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New law, new nurses.
Davidson J
Br J Perioper Nurs; 2000 Oct; 10(10):502-3. PubMed ID: 11892312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Living in a state of denial. Is the NHS right to deny drugs for cancer before it is terminal?
Jeffs L; Lehane M; Justice S; Singleton C
Nurs Stand; 2005 Jul 20-26; 19(45):28-9. PubMed ID: 16050225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Commissioning ethically and legally: the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Sheehan M; Newdick C
Br J Gen Pract; 2013 Sep; 63(614):496-7. PubMed ID: 23998836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Is it in Charlie Gard's best interest to die?
Savulescu J
Lancet; 2017 May; 389(10082):1868-1869. PubMed ID: 28478974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Very high cost treatment for a single individual.
Rodrigues VC
J Public Health Med; 2003 Sep; 25(3):274; author reply 274. PubMed ID: 14575212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Healthcare services citizen's right and healthcare systems safeguard. Considerations rising from the Charlie Gard story.].
Gristina GR
Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):350-354. PubMed ID: 28901341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Law, ethics, and emotion: the Charlie Gard case.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2017 Jul; 358():j3152. PubMed ID: 28676496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Law/evidence-based medicine. Burden of proof.
Dimond B
Health Serv J; 1996 Nov; 106(5529):suppl 11. PubMed ID: 10163033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The UK's PPE procurement scandal reminds us why we need ways to hold ministers to account.
McKee M
BMJ; 2021 Mar; 372():n639. PubMed ID: 33685915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NICE, the draft fertility guideline and dodging the big question.
McMillan JR
J Med Ethics; 2003 Dec; 29(6):313-4. PubMed ID: 14662807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rationing healthcare: the appeal of muddling through elegantly.
Hunter DJ
Healthc Pap; 2001; 2(2):31-7; discussion 69-75. PubMed ID: 12811143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accountability for reasonableness: an update.
Daniels N; Sabin JE
BMJ; 2008 Oct; 337():a1850. PubMed ID: 18845595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Government abandons plans to use payments to prevent private providers selecting simplest cases.
Hawkes N
BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6728. PubMed ID: 23036919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. NHS resource allocation: a question of funding?
McHale J
Br J Nurs; 2011 Jul 28-Aug 4; 20(14):888-9. PubMed ID: 21841679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
