These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28728496)

  • 1. A Missing Piece in Clinical Trial Inspections in Latin America: Interviews With Research Subjects in Peru.
    Minaya GE; Fuentes-Delgado DJ; Ugalde A; Homedes N
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Oct; 12(4):232-245. PubMed ID: 28728496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why take part in personalised cancer research? Patients' genetic misconception, genetic responsibility and incomprehension of stratification-an empirical-ethical examination.
    Perry J; Wöhlke S; Heßling AC; Schicktanz S
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2017 Sep; 26(5):. PubMed ID: 27507437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials.
    Daugherty CK; Ratain MJ; Minami H; Banik DM; Vogelzang NJ; Stadler WM; Siegler M
    J Clin Oncol; 1998 Jul; 16(7):2305-12. PubMed ID: 9667244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Presuming patient autonomy in the face of therapeutic misconception.
    McConville P
    Bioethics; 2017 Nov; 31(9):711-715. PubMed ID: 28857220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized evaluation of trial acceptability by INcentive (RETAIN): Study protocol for two embedded randomized controlled trials.
    Krutsinger DC; McMahon J; Stephens-Shields AJ; Bayes B; Brooks S; Hitsman BL; Lubitz SF; Reyes C; Schnoll RA; Ryan Greysen S; Mercede A; Patel MS; Reale C; Barg F; Karlawish J; Polsky D; Volpp KG; Halpern SD
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2019 Jan; 76():1-8. PubMed ID: 30414865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
    Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed Consent in Two Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers: Insights From Research Coordinators.
    Suver CM; Hamann JK; Chin EM; Goldstein FC; Blazel HM; Manzanares CM; Doerr MJ; Asthana SJ; Mangravite LM; Levey AI; Lah JJ; Edwards DF
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(2):114-124. PubMed ID: 32175821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rethinking the therapeutic misconception: social justice, patient advocacy, and cancer clinical trial recruitment in the US safety net.
    Burke NJ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 15():68. PubMed ID: 25240404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient reactions to confidentiality, liability, and financial aspects of informed consent in cardiology research.
    Fortune-Greeley AK; Hardy NC; Lin L; Friedman JY; Lawlor JS; Muhlbaier LH; Hall MA; Schulman KA; Sugarman J; Weinfurt KP
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2010 Mar; 3(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 20233979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Our flawed approach to undue inducement in medical research.
    Lee E
    Bioethics; 2019 Jan; 33(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 30014475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using Cognitive Interviews to Enhance Measurement in Empirical Bioethics: Developing a Measure of the Preventive Misconception in Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials.
    Sugarman J; Seils DM; Watson-Ormond JK; Weinfurt KP
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2016; 7(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 27747258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing decisional capacity for research participation in psychiatric patients and their relatives.
    George DE; Dholakia S; Tharyan P
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2018; 3(2):125-133. PubMed ID: 28918381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed consent to HIV cure research.
    Bromwich D; Millum JR
    J Med Ethics; 2017 Feb; 43(2):108-113. PubMed ID: 27288096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gatekeeping in cancer clinical trials in Canada: The ethics of recruiting the "ideal" patient.
    Bell JAH; Kelly MT; Gelmon K; Chi K; Ho A; Rodney P; Balneaves LG
    Cancer Med; 2020 Jun; 9(12):4107-4113. PubMed ID: 32314549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical trial informed consent information for participants can be improved].
    Wadmann S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2016 Aug; 178(32):. PubMed ID: 27507029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients' understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials.
    Behrendt C; Gölz T; Roesler C; Bertz H; Wünsch A
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 21098797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Listening to the voices of the general public in India on biomedical research--an exploratory study.
    Vaz M; Vaz M; Srinivasan K
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2015; 12(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 25920970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The benefit/risk ratio challenge in clinical research, and the case of HIV cure: an introduction.
    Eyal N
    J Med Ethics; 2017 Feb; 43(2):65-66. PubMed ID: 27215763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are Well-Informed Potential Trial Participants More Likely to Participate?
    de Oliveira LLH; Vissoci JRN; Machado WL; Rodrigues CG; Limkakeng AT
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):363-371. PubMed ID: 29073806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.