These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28728854)

  • 21. Characterization of Breast Masses in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study.
    Chan HP; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Jeffries DO; Klein KA; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 28647388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.
    Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].
    Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation.
    Gard CC; Aiello Bowles EJ; Miglioretti DL; Taplin SH; Rutter CM
    Breast J; 2015; 21(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 26133090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications.
    Clauser P; Nagl G; Helbich TH; Pinker-Domenig K; Weber M; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Baltzer PAT
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2161-2168. PubMed ID: 27842661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification.
    Gülsün M; Demirkazik FB; Ariyürek M
    Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 12927667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Breast tomosynthesis for the clarification of mammographic BI-RADS 3 lesions can decrease follow-up examinations and enables immediate cancer diagnosis.
    Bahrs SD; Otto V; Hattermann V; Klumpp B; Hahn M; Nikolaou K; Siegmann-Luz K
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct; 59(10):1176-1183. PubMed ID: 29451022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interobserver Variability Between Breast Imagers Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS MRI Lexicon.
    Grimm LJ; Anderson AL; Baker JA; Johnson KS; Walsh R; Yoon SC; Ghate SV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1120-4. PubMed ID: 25905951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Apruzzese A; Bassetti E; Brancato B; Carozzi F; Catarzi S; Lamberini MP; Marcelli G; Pellizzoni R; Pesce B; Risso G; Russo F; Scorsolini A
    Breast; 2005 Aug; 14(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 16085233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in determining breast density according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS® Atlas.
    Pesce K; Tajerian M; Chico MJ; Swiecicki MP; Boietti B; Frangella MJ; Benitez S
    Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2020; 62(6):481-486. PubMed ID: 32493654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors.
    Yao MM; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Lee CS
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1048-1052. PubMed ID: 30195413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists.
    Neuschler EI; Butler R; Young CA; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Donlan P; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Lavin PT; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Schilling KJ; Tucker FL; Dogan BE
    Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 29178816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Changing Rates of BI-RADS Final Assessment over Time.
    Raghu M; Durand MA; Andrejeva L; Goehler A; Michalski MH; Geisel JL; Hooley RJ; Horvath LJ; Butler R; Forman HP; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 27139264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nonmasslike enhancement at breast MR imaging: the added value of mammography and US for lesion categorization.
    Thomassin-Naggara I; Trop I; Chopier J; David J; Lalonde L; Darai E; Rouzier R; Uzan S
    Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 21771958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the applicability of BI-RADS® MRI for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Travieso-Aja MM; Maldonado-Saluzzi D; Naranjo-Santana P; Fernández-Ruiz C; Severino-Rondón W; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Luzardo OP
    Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2019; 61(6):477-488. PubMed ID: 31262509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A dedicated BI-RADS training programme: effect on the inter-observer variation among screening radiologists.
    Timmers JM; van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ; Verbeek AL; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2184-8. PubMed ID: 21899969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interobserver variability in upgraded and non-upgraded BI-RADS 3 lesions.
    Michaels AY; Chung CSW; Frost EP; Birdwell RL; Giess CS
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Aug; 72(8):694.e1-694.e6. PubMed ID: 28381334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
    Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prevalence and Predictive Value of BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 Lesions Detected on Breast MRI: Correlation with Study Indication.
    Chikarmane SA; Tai R; Meyer JE; Giess CS
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):435-441. PubMed ID: 27955878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.