These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28731878)

  • 1. Correlation of Corneal Biomechanical Stiffness With Refractive Error and Ocular Biometry in a Pediatric Population.
    Matalia J; Francis M; Gogri P; Panmand P; Matalia H; Sinha Roy A
    Cornea; 2017 Oct; 36(10):1221-1226. PubMed ID: 28731878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of Age and Myopia in Simultaneous Assessment of Corneal and Extraocular Tissue Stiffness by Air-Puff Applanation.
    Matalia J; Francis M; Tejwani S; Dudeja G; Rajappa N; Sinha Roy A
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Jul; 32(7):486-93. PubMed ID: 27400081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship Between Corneal Hysteresis and Corneal Resistance Factor with Other Ocular Parameters.
    Rosa N; Lanza M; De Bernardo M; Signoriello G; Chiodini P
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2015; 30(5-6):335-9. PubMed ID: 24506466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in myopes and emmetropes using the Corvis ST.
    Lee R; Chang RT; Wong IY; Lai JS; Lee JW; Singh K
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 26893029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship among corneal biomechanics, refractive error, and axial length.
    Bueno-Gimeno I; España-Gregori E; Gene-Sampedro A; Lanzagorta-Aresti A; Piñero-Llorens DP
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 May; 91(5):507-13. PubMed ID: 24705484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics of Corneal Biomechanics in Chinese Preschool Children With Different Refractive Status.
    Long W; Zhao Y; Hu Y; Li Z; Zhang X; Zhao W; Yang X; Cui D; Trier K
    Cornea; 2019 Nov; 38(11):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 31033694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Influence factors and differences of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam system combined with Corvis ST].
    Peng YS; Chen M; Tian L; Li H; Li DW; Zhang FF
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 56(2):110-117. PubMed ID: 32074821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of Anterior Biometry on Corneal Biomechanical Stiffness of Glaucomatous Eyes Treated With Chronic Medication or Filtration Surgery.
    Tejwani S; Francis M; Dinakaran S; Kamath V; Tilva B; Das RK; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
    J Glaucoma; 2019 Jul; 28(7):626-632. PubMed ID: 30921272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea Using a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer in Healthy Eyes.
    Lee H; Kang DSY; Ha BJ; Choi JY; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Yonsei Med J; 2018 Nov; 59(9):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 30328327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial lengths of myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic children.
    Dogan M; Elgin U; Sen E; Tekin K; Yilmazbas P
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 39(2):335-340. PubMed ID: 29285706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Topographic and biomechanical differences between hyperopic and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Qazi MA; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 15721696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 5-year prospective follow-up of Artisan phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism.
    Qasem Q; Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(5):283-90. PubMed ID: 20332652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cornea biomechanical characteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children.
    Lim L; Gazzard G; Chan YH; Fong A; Kotecha A; Sim EL; Tan D; Tong L; Saw SM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Sep; 49(9):3852-7. PubMed ID: 18469185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aiming for emmetropia after cataract surgery: Swedish National Cataract Register study.
    Behndig A; Montan P; Stenevi U; Kugelberg M; Zetterström C; Lundström M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 38(7):1181-6. PubMed ID: 22727287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between refractive error, corneal power, and thickness in a large population with a wide range of ametropia.
    AlMahmoud T; Priest D; Munger R; Jackson WB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Mar; 52(3):1235-42. PubMed ID: 21051694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study.
    Schallhorn JM; Schallhorn SC; Ou Y
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Mar; 122(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 25444636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wavefront aberration and its association with intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in myopic eyes.
    Qu J; Lu F; Wu J; Wang Q; Xu C; Zhou X; He JC
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1447-54. PubMed ID: 17662440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Myopia prevalence and ocular biometry in children and adolescents at different altitudes: a cross-sectional study in Chongqing and Tibet, China.
    Xiang Y; Cheng H; Sun K; Zheng S; Du M; Gao N; Zhang T; Yang X; Xia J; Huang R; Wan W; Hu K
    BMJ Open; 2024 May; 14(5):e078018. PubMed ID: 38692719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corneal biomechanical measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Chen MC; Lee N; Bourla N; Hamilton DR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1886-91. PubMed ID: 19006734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Correlation between refraction and ocular biometry].
    Touzeau O; Allouch C; Borderie V; Kopito R; Laroche L
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2003 Apr; 26(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 12843892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.