268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28731964)
1. The Relationship Between Environmental Sound Awareness and Speech Recognition Skills in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users.
Harris MS; Boyce L; Pisoni DB; Shafiro V; Moberly AC
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):e308-e314. PubMed ID: 28731964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental Sound Awareness in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users and Cochlear Implant Candidates.
McMahon KR; Moberly AC; Shafiro V; Harris MS
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e964-e971. PubMed ID: 30252797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonverbal Reasoning as a Contributor to Sentence Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants.
Mattingly JK; Castellanos I; Moberly AC
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e956-e963. PubMed ID: 30444843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How Does Nonverbal Reasoning Affect Sentence Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Peers?
Moberly AC; Mattingly JK; Castellanos I
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(3):127-138. PubMed ID: 31266013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How does aging affect recognition of spectrally degraded speech?
Moberly AC; Vasil KJ; Wucinich TL; Safdar N; Boyce L; Roup C; Holt RF; Adunka OF; Castellanos I; Shafiro V; Houston DM; Pisoni DB
Laryngoscope; 2018 Nov; 128 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):. PubMed ID: 30325518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Relationship Between Spectral Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition: Adult Versus Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Gifford RH; Noble JH; Camarata SM; Sunderhaus LW; Dwyer RT; Dawant BM; Dietrich MS; Labadie RF
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518771176. PubMed ID: 29716437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity".
Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Nittrouer S
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26301844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perception of environmental sounds by experienced cochlear implant patients.
Shafiro V; Gygi B; Cheng MY; Vachhani J; Mulvey M
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):511-23. PubMed ID: 21248643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward a Nonspeech Test of Auditory Cognition: Semantic Context Effects in Environmental Sound Identification in Adults of Varying Age and Hearing Abilities.
Shafiro V; Sheft S; Norris M; Spanos G; Radasevich K; Formsma P; Gygi B
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0167030. PubMed ID: 27893791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual organization of sequential stimuli in cochlear implant listeners: A temporal processing approach.
Saki N; Nikakhlagh S; Mirmomeni G; Bayat A
Int Tinnitus J; 2019 Jan; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 31469526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?
Capretta NR; Moberly AC
Laryngoscope; 2016 Mar; 126(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 26256441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cognitive factors contribute to speech perception in cochlear-implant users and age-matched normal-hearing listeners under vocoded conditions.
O'Neill ER; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):195. PubMed ID: 31370651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "Product" Versus "Process" Measures in Assessing Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants.
Moberly AC; Castellanos I; Vasil KJ; Adunka OF; Pisoni DB
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Mar; 39(3):e195-e202. PubMed ID: 29342056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.
McMurray B; Ellis TP; Apfelbaum KS
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):961-980. PubMed ID: 30531260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
