192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28732149)
1. Beware of the origin of numbers: Standard scoring of the SF-12 and SF-36 summary measures distorts measurement and score interpretations.
Hagell P; Westergren A; Årestedt K
Res Nurs Health; 2017 Aug; 40(4):378-386. PubMed ID: 28732149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring health-related quality of life: psychometric evaluation of the Tunisian version of the SF-12 health survey.
Younsi M; Chakroun M
Qual Life Res; 2014 Sep; 23(7):2047-54. PubMed ID: 24515673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement properties of the 12-item short-form health survey in stroke.
Westergren A; Hagell P
J Neurosci Nurs; 2014 Feb; 46(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 24399165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of health-related quality of life in spine treatment: conversion from SF-36 to VR-12.
Gornet MF; Copay AG; Sorensen KM; Schranck FW
Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1292-1297. PubMed ID: 29501747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scoring the SF-36 in Orthopaedics: A Brief Guide.
Laucis NC; Hays RD; Bhattacharyya T
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Oct; 97(19):1628-34. PubMed ID: 26446970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: a response.
Ware JE; Kosinski M
Qual Life Res; 2001; 10(5):405-13; discussion 415-20. PubMed ID: 11763203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing short form and RAND physical and mental health summary scores: results from total hip arthroplasty and high-risk primary-care patients.
Blanchard CM; Côté I; Feeny D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2004; 20(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 15209183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multidimensional item response theory models yielded good fit and reliable scores for the Short Form-12 questionnaire.
Forero CG; Vilagut G; Adroher ND; Alonso J;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 66(7):790-801. PubMed ID: 23707080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement properties of the SF-12 health survey in Parkinson's disease.
Hagell P; Westergren A
J Parkinsons Dis; 2011; 1(2):185-96. PubMed ID: 23934920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores?
Taft C; Karlsson J; Sullivan M
Qual Life Res; 2001; 10(5):395-404. PubMed ID: 11763202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scoring Mental Health Quality of Life With the SF-36 in Patients With and Without Diabetes Foot Complications.
Ahn J; Del Core MA; Wukich DK; Liu GT; Lalli T; VanPelt MD; La Fontaine J; Lavery LA; Raspovic KM
Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2018 Mar; 17(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 29546783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and testing of the UK SF-12 (short form health survey).
Jenkinson C; Layte R
J Health Serv Res Policy; 1997 Jan; 2(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 10180648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric evaluation of the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials.
Gandhi SK; Salmon JW; Zhao SZ; Lambert BL; Gore PR; Conrad K
Clin Ther; 2001 Jul; 23(7):1080-98. PubMed ID: 11519772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.
Gandek B; Ware JE; Aaronson NK; Apolone G; Bjorner JB; Brazier JE; Bullinger M; Kaasa S; Leplege A; Prieto L; Sullivan M
J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 51(11):1171-8. PubMed ID: 9817135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.
Ware JE; Gandek B; Kosinski M; Aaronson NK; Apolone G; Brazier J; Bullinger M; Kaasa S; Leplège A; Prieto L; Sullivan M; Thunedborg K
J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 51(11):1167-70. PubMed ID: 9817134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do differences in methods for constructing SF-36 physical and mental health summary measures change their associations with chronic medical conditions and utilization?
Cunningham WE; Nakazono TT; Tsai KL; Hays RD
Qual Life Res; 2003 Dec; 12(8):1029-35. PubMed ID: 14651420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The short form-12 and the measurement of health status in patients with cerebral aneurysms: performance, validity, and reliability.
King JT; Horowitz MB; Kassam AB; Yonas H; Roberts MS
J Neurosurg; 2005 Mar; 102(3):489-94. PubMed ID: 15796384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dimensionality and summary measures of the SF-36 v1.6: comparison of scale- and item-based approach across ECRHS II adults population.
Grassi M; Nucera A;
Value Health; 2010; 13(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 20088893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consequences of using SF-12 and RAND-12 when examining levels of well-being and psychological distress.
Lee A; Browne MO; Villanueva E
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2008 Apr; 42(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 18330774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of the SF-36 questionnaire in adult survivors of childhood cancer: evaluation of data quality, score reliability, and scaling assumptions.
Reulen RC; Zeegers MP; Jenkinson C; Lancashire ER; Winter DL; Jenney ME; Hawkins MM
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Oct; 4():77. PubMed ID: 17022814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
