These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28732282)

  • 1. Proficient use of low spatial frequencies facilitates face memory but shows protracted maturation throughout adolescence.
    Peters JC; Kemner C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():61-67. PubMed ID: 28732282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural processing of high and low spatial frequency information in faces changes across development: qualitative changes in face processing during adolescence.
    Peters JC; Vlamings P; Kemner C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2013 May; 37(9):1448-57. PubMed ID: 23480636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facial expressions perceived by the adolescent brain: Towards the proficient use of low spatial frequency information.
    Peters JC; Kemner C
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Oct; 129():1-7. PubMed ID: 28778549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Configural face perception in childhood and adolescence: An individual differences approach.
    Petrakova A; Sommer W; Junge M; Hildebrandt A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():148-176. PubMed ID: 29940535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognition memory for low- and high-frequency-filtered emotional faces: Low spatial frequencies drive emotional memory enhancement, whereas high spatial frequencies drive the emotion-induced recognition bias.
    Rohr M; Tröger J; Michely N; Uhde A; Wentura D
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):699-715. PubMed ID: 28213830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information.
    Boutet I; Collin C; Faubert J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1078-93. PubMed ID: 14674634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low Spatial Frequency Sensitivity and Emotional Face Processing in Adolescents: An Event-related Potential Study.
    Grose-Fifer J; Lobel M; diFilipo D; Gordon J
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2020 Aug; 45(5):279-296. PubMed ID: 32648782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expertise and configural coding in face recognition.
    Rhodes G; Tan S; Brake S; Taylor K
    Br J Psychol; 1989 Aug; 80 ( Pt 3)():313-31. PubMed ID: 2790391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces.
    Goffaux V; Hault B; Michel C; Vuong QC; Rossion B
    Perception; 2005; 34(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15773608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial Mechanisms within the Dorsal Visual Pathway Contribute to the Configural Processing of Faces.
    Zachariou V; Nikas CV; Safiullah ZN; Gotts SJ; Ungerleider LG
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Aug; 27(8):4124-4138. PubMed ID: 27522076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The horizontal tuning of face perception relies on the processing of intermediate and high spatial frequencies.
    Goffaux V; van Zon J; Schiltz C
    J Vis; 2011 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 21900371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the early modulation of brain activity by fearful facial expressions primarily mediated by coarse low spatial frequency information?
    Vlamings PH; Goffaux V; Kemner C
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):12.1-13. PubMed ID: 19757890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of face spatial frequencies on cortical processing revealed by magnetoencephalography.
    Hsiao FJ; Hsieh JC; Lin YY; Chang Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 May 20-27; 380(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 15854750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Face and body recognition show similar improvement during childhood.
    Bank S; Rhodes G; Read A; Jeffery L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Sep; 137():1-11. PubMed ID: 25909913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Double dissociation of configural and featural face processing on P1 and P2 components as a function of spatial attention.
    Wang H; Guo S; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Aug; 53(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 27167853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relative importance of heads, bodies, and movement to person recognition across development.
    Robbins RA; Coltheart M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Oct; 138():1-14. PubMed ID: 26002490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age Differences in Face Processing: The Role of Perceptual Degradation and Holistic Processing.
    Boutet I; Meinhardt-Injac B
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2019 Aug; 74(6):933-942. PubMed ID: 29373754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of configural processing on the perceptual spatial resolution for face features.
    Namdar G; Avidan G; Ganel T
    Cortex; 2015 Nov; 72():115-123. PubMed ID: 25998751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reach trajectories reveal delayed processing of low spatial frequency faces in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Awasthi B; Friedman J; Williams MA
    Cogn Neurosci; 2012; 3(2):120-30. PubMed ID: 24168693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.