153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28732923)
1. Effect of TEMPO-oxidization and rapid cooling on thermo-structural properties of nanocellulose.
Mhd Haniffa MAC; Ching YC; Chuah CH; Yong Ching K; Nazri N; Abdullah LC; Nai-Shang L
Carbohydr Polym; 2017 Oct; 173():91-99. PubMed ID: 28732923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chemical isolation and characterization of different cellulose nanofibers from cotton stalks.
Soni B; Hassan el B; Mahmoud B
Carbohydr Polym; 2015 Dec; 134():581-9. PubMed ID: 26428161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of structural, thermal and proton conductivity properties of micro- and nanocelluloses.
Jankowska I; Pankiewicz R; Pogorzelec-Glaser K; Ławniczak P; Łapiński A; Tritt-Goc J
Carbohydr Polym; 2018 Nov; 200():536-542. PubMed ID: 30177195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transparent bionanocomposite films based on chitosan and TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers with enhanced mechanical and barrier properties.
Soni B; Hassan EB; Schilling MW; Mahmoud B
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Oct; 151():779-789. PubMed ID: 27474625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strong, self-standing oxygen barrier films from nanocelluloses modified with regioselective oxidative treatments.
Sirviö JA; Kolehmainen A; Visanko M; Liimatainen H; Niinimäki J; Hormi OE
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2014 Aug; 6(16):14384-90. PubMed ID: 25089516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) Modified by Plasma and TEMPO-Oxidized Celluloses.
Panaitescu DM; Vizireanu S; Stoian SA; Nicolae CA; Gabor AR; Damian CM; Trusca R; Carpen LG; Dinescu G
Polymers (Basel); 2020 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 32646005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Insights into the production and physicochemical properties of oxycellulose microcrystalline with coexisting crystalline forms.
Ahmed-Haras MR; Kao N; Ward L; Islam MS
Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Mar; 146():150-161. PubMed ID: 31837363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Properties of nanocellulose isolated from corncob residue using sulfuric acid, formic acid, oxidative and mechanical methods.
Liu C; Li B; Du H; Lv D; Zhang Y; Yu G; Mu X; Peng H
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Oct; 151():716-724. PubMed ID: 27474618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aspirin degradation in surface-charged TEMPO-oxidized mesoporous crystalline nanocellulose.
Carlsson DO; Hua K; Forsgren J; Mihranyan A
Int J Pharm; 2014 Jan; 461(1-2):74-81. PubMed ID: 24291076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sono-assisted TEMPO oxidation of oil palm lignocellulosic biomass for isolation of nanocrystalline cellulose.
Rohaizu R; Wanrosli WD
Ultrason Sonochem; 2017 Jan; 34():631-639. PubMed ID: 27773290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hevea brasiliensis mediated synthesis of nanocellulose: Effect of preparation methods on morphology and properties.
Onkarappa HS; Prakash GK; Pujar GH; Rajith Kumar CR; Latha MS; Betageri VS
Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Oct; 160():1021-1028. PubMed ID: 32504707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physicochemical Properties of Nanocellulose Isolated from Cotton Stalk Waste.
Li M; He B; Chen Y; Zhao L
ACS Omega; 2021 Oct; 6(39):25162-25169. PubMed ID: 34632175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reinforcing canola protein matrix with chemically tailored nanocrystalline cellulose improves the functionality of canola protein-based packaging materials.
Dissanayake T; Peng Chang B; Mekonnen TH; Senaka Ranadheera C; Narvaez-Bravo C; Bandara N
Food Chem; 2022 Jul; 383():132618. PubMed ID: 35255367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of TEMPO-oxidization strength on the properties of cellulose nanofibril reinforced polyvinyl acetate nanocomposites.
Hamou KB; Kaddami H; Dufresne A; Boufi S; Magnin A; Erchiqui F
Carbohydr Polym; 2018 Feb; 181():1061-1070. PubMed ID: 29253932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of carboxylated cellulose nanofibrils-filled magnetic chitosan hydrogel beads as adsorbents for Pb(II).
Zhou Y; Fu S; Zhang L; Zhan H; Levit MV
Carbohydr Polym; 2014 Jan; 101():75-82. PubMed ID: 24299751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preparation of nanocellulose from Imperata brasiliensis grass using Taguchi method.
Benini KCCC; Voorwald HJC; Cioffi MOH; Rezende MC; Arantes V
Carbohydr Polym; 2018 Jul; 192():337-346. PubMed ID: 29691029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from Chinese medicine residues.
He Q; Bai Y; Lu Y; Cui B; Huang Z; Yang Q; Jiang D; Shao D
Biomass Convers Biorefin; 2022 Oct; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 36259074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Different Preparation Method of Nanocellulose from Macaranga gigantea and Its Preliminary Study on Packaging Film Potential.
Jasmani L; Jamaluddin NAN; Rusli R; Adnan S; Zakaria S
Polymers (Basel); 2022 Oct; 14(21):. PubMed ID: 36365585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of surface charge density on the ice recrystallization inhibition activity of nanocelluloses.
Li T; Zhong Q; Zhao B; Lenaghan S; Wang S; Wu T
Carbohydr Polym; 2020 Apr; 234():115863. PubMed ID: 32070502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preparation of highly charged cellulose nanofibrils using high-pressure homogenization coupled with strong acid hydrolysis pretreatments.
Tian C; Yi J; Wu Y; Wu Q; Qing Y; Wang L
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Jan; 136():485-92. PubMed ID: 26572379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
