These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28733190)

  • 1. Reference interval estimation: Methodological comparison using extensive simulations and empirical data.
    Daly CH; Higgins V; Adeli K; Grey VL; Hamid JS
    Clin Biochem; 2017 Dec; 50(18):1145-1158. PubMed ID: 28733190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reference interval estimation of small sample sizes: A methodologic comparison using a computer-simulation study.
    Le Boedec K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2019 Jun; 48(2):335-346. PubMed ID: 31228287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective assessment of frequency distribution histograms and consequences on reference interval accuracy for small sample sizes: A computer-simulated study.
    Coisnon C; Mitchell MA; Rannou B; Le Boedec K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2021 Sep; 50(3):427-441. PubMed ID: 34476826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
    Hewett P; Ganser GH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Centile charts I: new method of assessment for univariate reference intervals.
    Koduah M; Iles TC; Nix BJ
    Clin Chem; 2004 May; 50(5):901-6. PubMed ID: 15016727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity and specificity of normality tests and consequences on reference interval accuracy at small sample size: a computer-simulation study.
    Le Boedec K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2016 Dec; 45(4):648-656. PubMed ID: 27556235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An appraisal of statistical procedures used in derivation of reference intervals.
    Ichihara K; Boyd JC;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Nov; 48(11):1537-51. PubMed ID: 21062226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical appraisal of two Box-Cox formulae for their utility in determining reference intervals by realistic simulation and extensive real-world data analyses.
    Ichihara K; Yamashita T; Kataoka H; Sato S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Dec; 242():107820. PubMed ID: 37871480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reference intervals: an update.
    Horn PS; Pesce AJ
    Clin Chim Acta; 2003 Aug; 334(1-2):5-23. PubMed ID: 12867273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A more flexible parametric estimation of univariate reference intervals: a new method based on the GS-distribution.
    Trujillano J; Muiño JM; March J; Sorribas A
    Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Apr; 379(1-2):71-80. PubMed ID: 17276425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of reference intervals from small samples: an example using canine plasma creatinine.
    Geffré A; Braun JP; Trumel C; Concordet D
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2009 Dec; 38(4):477-84. PubMed ID: 19473330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resampling approach for determination of the method for reference interval calculation in clinical laboratory practice.
    Pavlov IY; Wilson AR; Delgado JC
    Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):1217-22. PubMed ID: 20554803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Centile charts II: alternative nonparametric approach for establishing time-specific reference centiles and assessment of the sample size required.
    Griffiths JK; Iles TC; Koduah M; Nix AB
    Clin Chem; 2004 May; 50(5):907-14. PubMed ID: 15016724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precise confidence intervals of regression-based reference limits: Method comparisons and sample size requirements.
    Shieh G
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Dec; 91():191-197. PubMed ID: 29100113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evaluation of statistical methods for estimating the lower limit of detection.
    Huang S; Wang T; Yang M
    Assay Drug Dev Technol; 2013 Feb; 11(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 22574654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should we maintain the 95 percent reference intervals in the era of wellness testing? A concept paper.
    Jørgensen LG; Brandslund I; Hyltoft Petersen P
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 15327009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confidence intervals of reference limits in small reference sample groups.
    Braun JP; Concordet D; Geffré A; Bourges Abella N; Trumel C
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2013 Sep; 42(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 23899127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches to ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
    Hajian-Tilaki KO; Hanley JA; Joseph L; Collet JP
    Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 8994156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analytical goals for the estimation of non-Gaussian reference intervals.
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Gowans EM; Blaabjerg O; Hørder M
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1989 Dec; 49(8):727-37. PubMed ID: 2617130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.