These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

820 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28733262)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of High-performance Biomarker Tests vs Fecal Immunochemical Test for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Goede SL; Bosch LJW; Melotte V; Carvalho B; van Engeland M; Meijer GA; de Koning HJ; van Ballegooijen M
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Apr; 16(4):504-512.e11. PubMed ID: 28733262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.
    Sharma T
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():70-76. PubMed ID: 32179290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost Effectiveness of Screening Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis for Colorectal Cancer.
    Gini A; Zauber AG; Cenin DR; Omidvari AH; Hempstead SE; Fink AK; Lowenfels AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Gastroenterology; 2018 Feb; 154(3):556-567.e18. PubMed ID: 29102616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening With a Blood Test That Meets the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Coverage Decision.
    van den Puttelaar R; Nascimento de Lima P; Knudsen AB; Rutter CM; Kuntz KM; de Jonge L; Escudero FA; Lieberman D; Zauber AG; Hahn AI; Inadomi JM; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Gastroenterology; 2024 Jul; 167(2):368-377. PubMed ID: 38552671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening With Blood-Based Biomarkers (Liquid Biopsy) vs Fecal Tests or Colonoscopy.
    Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A; Weng Y; Schoen RE; Dominitz JA; Desai M; Lieberman D
    Gastroenterology; 2024 Jul; 167(2):378-391. PubMed ID: 38552670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Fecal Immunochemical Testing With and Without Postpolypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Greuter MJE; de Klerk CM; Meijer GA; Dekker E; Coupé VMH
    Ann Intern Med; 2017 Oct; 167(8):544-554. PubMed ID: 28973514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of one versus two sample faecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening.
    Goede SL; van Roon AH; Reijerink JC; van Vuuren AJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Habbema JD; Kuipers EJ; van Leerdam ME; van Ballegooijen M
    Gut; 2013 May; 62(5):727-34. PubMed ID: 22490518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia.
    Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A
    Gastroenterology; 2016 Sep; 151(3):427-439.e6. PubMed ID: 27311556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interval Colorectal Cancer Incidence Among Subjects Undergoing Multiple Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Testing.
    van der Vlugt M; Grobbee EJ; Bossuyt PMM; Bos A; Bongers E; Spijker W; Kuipers EJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Aug; 153(2):439-447.e2. PubMed ID: 28483499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
    Phisalprapa P; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
    J Med Econ; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 31560247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Faecal immunochemical tests versus colonoscopy for post-polypectomy surveillance: an accuracy, acceptability and economic study.
    Atkin W; Cross AJ; Kralj-Hans I; MacRae E; Piggott C; Pearson S; Wooldrage K; Brown J; Lucas F; Prendergast A; Marchevsky N; Patel B; Pack K; Howe R; Skrobanski H; Kerrison R; Swart N; Snowball J; Duffy SW; Morris S; von Wagner C; Halloran S
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jan; 23(1):1-84. PubMed ID: 30618357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of single colonoscopy versus single fecal test for colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment.
    Ishibashi F; Suzuki S; Kobayashi K; Tanaka R; Kawakami T; Mochida K; Nagai M; Ishibashi Y; Morishita T
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 Jul; 39(7):1328-1335. PubMed ID: 38348570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fecal immunochemical test accuracy in average-risk colorectal cancer screening.
    Hernandez V; Cubiella J; Gonzalez-Mao MC; Iglesias F; Rivera C; Iglesias MB; Cid L; Castro I; de Castro L; Vega P; Hermo JA; Macenlle R; Martínez-Turnes A; Martínez-Ares D; Estevez P; Cid E; Vidal MC; López-Martínez A; Hijona E; Herreros-Villanueva M; Bujanda L; Rodriguez-Prada JI;
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jan; 20(4):1038-47. PubMed ID: 24574776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quantitative immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening.
    Wilschut JA; Hol L; Dekker E; Jansen JB; Van Leerdam ME; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; Habbema JD; Van Ballegooijen M
    Gastroenterology; 2011 Nov; 141(5):1648-55.e1. PubMed ID: 21784045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for colorectal cancer.
    Barzi A; Lenz HJ; Quinn DI; Sadeghi S
    Cancer; 2017 May; 123(9):1516-1527. PubMed ID: 28117881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.