These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28734280)

  • 1. Selected configuration interaction method using sampled first-order corrections to wave functions.
    Ohtsuka Y; Hasegawa JY
    J Chem Phys; 2017 Jul; 147(3):034102. PubMed ID: 28734280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calculations of potential energy surfaces using Monte Carlo configuration interaction.
    Coe JP; Taylor DJ; Paterson MJ
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Nov; 137(19):194111. PubMed ID: 23181298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Excited States with Selected Configuration Interaction-Quantum Monte Carlo: Chemically Accurate Excitation Energies and Geometries.
    Dash M; Feldt J; Moroni S; Scemama A; Filippi C
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Sep; 15(9):4896-4906. PubMed ID: 31348645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Excited states of methylene from quantum Monte Carlo.
    Zimmerman PM; Toulouse J; Zhang Z; Musgrave CB; Umrigar CJ
    J Chem Phys; 2009 Sep; 131(12):124103. PubMed ID: 19791848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Excited state calculations using phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo: Potential energy curves of low-lying C(2) singlet states.
    Purwanto W; Zhang S; Krakauer H
    J Chem Phys; 2009 Mar; 130(9):094107. PubMed ID: 19275396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tailoring CIPSI Expansions for QMC Calculations of Electronic Excitations: The Case Study of Thiophene.
    Dash M; Moroni S; Filippi C; Scemama A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jun; 17(6):3426-3434. PubMed ID: 34029098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimized Jastrow-Slater wave functions for ground and excited states: application to the lowest states of ethene.
    Schautz F; Filippi C
    J Chem Phys; 2004 Jun; 120(23):10931-41. PubMed ID: 15268123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. State-averaged Monte Carlo configuration interaction applied to electronically excited states.
    Coe JP; Paterson MJ
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Oct; 139(15):154103. PubMed ID: 24160496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of Monte Carlo configuration interaction: natural orbitals and second-order perturbation theory.
    Coe JP; Paterson MJ
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Nov; 137(20):204108. PubMed ID: 23205982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of Large Determinant Expansions in Quantum Monte Carlo.
    Ammar A; Giner E; Scemama A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Sep; 18(9):5325-5336. PubMed ID: 35997484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo configuration interaction with perturbation corrections for dissociation energies of first row diatomic molecules: C2, N2, O2, CO, and NO.
    Kelly TP; Perera A; Bartlett RJ; Greer JC
    J Chem Phys; 2014 Feb; 140(8):084114. PubMed ID: 24588155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Excited-State Diffusion Monte Carlo Calculations: A Simple and Efficient Two-Determinant Ansatz.
    Blunt NS; Neuscamman E
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Jan; 15(1):178-189. PubMed ID: 30525592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study of potential energy curves from the model space quantum Monte Carlo method.
    Ohtsuka Y; Ten-No S
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Dec; 143(21):214107. PubMed ID: 26646869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perturbatively Selected Configuration-Interaction Wave Functions for Efficient Geometry Optimization in Quantum Monte Carlo.
    Dash M; Moroni S; Scemama A; Filippi C
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Aug; 14(8):4176-4182. PubMed ID: 29953810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient local energy evaluation for multi-Slater wave functions in orbital space quantum Monte Carlo.
    Mahajan A; Sharma S
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Nov; 153(19):194108. PubMed ID: 33218236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spin-symmetry adaptation to the Monte Carlo correction configuration interaction wave functions.
    Ohtsuka Y
    J Chem Phys; 2019 Jul; 151(3):034115. PubMed ID: 31325932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An excited-state approach within full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo.
    Blunt NS; Smart SD; Booth GH; Alavi A
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Oct; 143(13):134117. PubMed ID: 26450302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of single particle orbital sets and configuration selection on multideterminant wavefunctions in quantum Monte Carlo.
    Clay RC; Morales MA
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Jun; 142(23):234103. PubMed ID: 26093546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Excited states from quantum Monte Carlo in the basis of Slater determinants.
    Humeniuk A; Mitrić R
    J Chem Phys; 2014 Nov; 141(19):194104. PubMed ID: 25416871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive multiconfigurational wave functions.
    Evangelista FA
    J Chem Phys; 2014 Mar; 140(12):124114. PubMed ID: 24697431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.