These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28734305)

  • 1. Exploring the free energy gain of phase separation via Markov state modeling.
    Biedermann M; Heuer A
    J Chem Phys; 2017 Jul; 147(3):034107. PubMed ID: 28734305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling non-Markovian data using Markov state and Langevin models.
    Lickert B; Stock G
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Dec; 153(24):244112. PubMed ID: 33380115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When memory pays: Discord in hidden Markov models.
    Lathouwers E; Bechhoefer J
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Jun; 95(6-1):062144. PubMed ID: 28709213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A nonparametric test for Markovianity in the illness-death model.
    Rodríguez-Girondo M; de Uña-Álvarez J
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4416-27. PubMed ID: 22975898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On approximating a weak Markovian process as Markovian: Are we justified when discarding longtime correlations.
    Leong KY; Wang F
    J Chem Phys; 2019 Feb; 150(8):085101. PubMed ID: 30823762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing Markovianity in the three-state progressive model via future-past association.
    Rodríguez-Girondo M; de Uña-Álvarez J
    Biom J; 2012 Mar; 54(2):163-80. PubMed ID: 22522376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Projected metastable Markov processes and their estimation with observable operator models.
    Wu H; Prinz JH; Noé F
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Oct; 143(14):144101. PubMed ID: 26472357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Set-free Markov state model building.
    Weber M; Fackeldey K; Schütte C
    J Chem Phys; 2017 Mar; 146(12):124133. PubMed ID: 28388134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying non-Markovianity for a chromophore-qubit pair in a super-Ohmic bath.
    Liu J; Sun K; Wang X; Zhao Y
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2015 Mar; 17(12):8087-96. PubMed ID: 25729785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Degree of non-Markovianity of quantum evolution.
    Chruściński D; Maniscalco S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Mar; 112(12):120404. PubMed ID: 24724632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental coherence and excitation effects in non-Markovian dynamics.
    Liu Y; Cheng W; Gao ZY; Zeng HS
    Opt Express; 2015 Sep; 23(18):23021-34. PubMed ID: 26368407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Error analysis and efficient sampling in Markovian state models for molecular dynamics.
    Singhal N; Pande VS
    J Chem Phys; 2005 Nov; 123(20):204909. PubMed ID: 16351319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous estimation of free energies and rates using forward flux sampling and mean first passage times.
    Thapar V; Escobedo FA
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Dec; 143(24):244113. PubMed ID: 26723657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
    Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection.
    Rivas Á; Huelga SF; Plenio MB
    Rep Prog Phys; 2014 Sep; 77(9):094001. PubMed ID: 25147025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accurate Estimation of Protein Folding and Unfolding Times: Beyond Markov State Models.
    Suárez E; Adelman JL; Zuckerman DM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Aug; 12(8):3473-81. PubMed ID: 27340835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo study of degenerate ground states and residual entropy in a frustrated honeycomb lattice Ising model.
    Andrews S; De Sterck H; Inglis S; Melko RG
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Apr; 79(4 Pt 1):041127. PubMed ID: 19518193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mode-dependent approach to state estimation of recurrent neural networks with Markovian jumping parameters and mixed delays.
    Huang H; Huang T; Chen X
    Neural Netw; 2013 Oct; 46():50-61. PubMed ID: 23708670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. tdc.msm: an R library for the analysis of multi-state survival data.
    Meira-Machado L; Cadarso-Suárez C; de Uña-Alvarez J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 May; 86(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 17350136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Free energies from dynamic weighted histogram analysis using unbiased Markov state model.
    Rosta E; Hummer G
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jan; 11(1):276-85. PubMed ID: 26574225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.