272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28734687)
1. Three-dimensional interlead distance predicts response and outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Clementy N; Laborie G; Pierre B; Benhenda N; Babuty D; Fauchier L
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Nov; 110(11):590-598. PubMed ID: 28734687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ventricular pacing site separation by cardiac computed tomography: validation for the prediction of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Modi S; Yee R; Scholl D; Stirrat J; Wong JA; Lydell C; Kotha V; Gula LJ; Skanes AC; Leong-Sit P; McCarty D; Drangova M; White JA
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1433-1442. PubMed ID: 28357725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization.
Leyva F; Zegard A; Qiu T; Acquaye E; Ferrante G; Walton J; Marshall H
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 29042422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiac resynchronization therapy when no lateral pacing option exists: vectorcardiographic guided non-lateral left ventricular lead placement predicts acute hemodynamic response.
Ross S; Odland HH; Aranda A; Edvardsen T; Gammelsrud LO; Haland TF; Cornelussen R; Hopp E; Kongsgaard E
Europace; 2018 Aug; 20(8):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 29036446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interlead anatomic and electrical distance predict outcome in CRT patients.
Stabile G; D'Onofrio A; Pepi P; De Simone A; Santamaria M; Caico SI; Rapacciuolo A; Padeletti L; Pecora D; Giovannini T; Arena G; Spotti A; Iuliano A; Bertaglia E; Malacrida M; Botto GL
Heart Rhythm; 2015 Nov; 12(11):2221-9. PubMed ID: 26001509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The left ventricular lead electrical delay predicts response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy.
Zhang H; Dai Z; Xiao P; Pan C; Zhang J; Hu Z; Chen S
Heart Lung Circ; 2014 Oct; 23(10):936-42. PubMed ID: 24996391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usefulness of notched duration to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Balci MM; Balci KG; Sen F; Maden O; Unal S; Selcuk MT; Selcuk H
Scand Cardiovasc J; 2015 Aug; 49(4):200-6. PubMed ID: 25920477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiac resynchronization therapy by multipoint pacing improves response of left ventricular mechanics and fluid dynamics: a three-dimensional and particle image velocimetry echo study.
Siciliano M; Migliore F; Badano L; Bertaglia E; Pedrizzetti G; Cavedon S; Zorzi A; Corrado D; Iliceto S; Muraru D
Europace; 2017 Nov; 19(11):1833-1840. PubMed ID: 28025231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefits of left ventricular endocardial pacing comparing failed implants and prior non-responders to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy: A subanalysis from the ALSYNC study.
Biffi M; Defaye P; Jaïs P; Ruffa F; Leclercq C; Gras D; Yang Z; Gerritse B; Ziacchi M; Morgan JM;
Int J Cardiol; 2018 May; 259():88-93. PubMed ID: 29579617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reverse ventricular remodeling and long-term survival in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization with surgically versus percutaneously placed left ventricular pacing leads.
Rickard J; Johnston DR; Price J; Tedford R; Baranowski B; Bassiouny M; Cantillon D; Grimm RA; Tang WHW; Varma N; Wilkoff BL
Heart Rhythm; 2015 Mar; 12(3):517-523. PubMed ID: 25460866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Additional value of three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Deplagne A; Bordachar P; Reant P; Montaudon M; Reuter S; Laborderie J; Dos Santos P; Roudaut R; Jais P; Haissaguerre M; Laurent F; Clementy J; Lafitte S
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2009; 102(6-7):497-508. PubMed ID: 19664569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are changes in the extent of left ventricular dyssynchrony as assessed by speckle tracking associated with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Ghani A; Delnoy PP; Ottervanger JP; Ramdat Misier AR; Smit JJ; Adiyaman A; Elvan A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 32(4):553-61. PubMed ID: 26585749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multipoint left ventricular pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves mid-term echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Pappone C; Ćalović Ž; Vicedomini G; Cuko A; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Romano E; Baldi M; Saviano M; Pappone A; Ciaccio C; Giannelli L; Ionescu B; Petretta A; Vitale R; Fundaliotis A; Tavazzi L; Santinelli V
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25109276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Baseline asynchrony, assessed circumferentially using temporal uniformity of strain, besides coincidence between site of latest mechanical activation and presumed left ventricular lead position, predicts favourable prognosis after resynchronization therapy.
Cavallino C; Rondano E; Magnani A; Leva L; Inglese E; Dell'era G; Occhetta E; Bortnik M; Marino PN
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 28(5):1011-21. PubMed ID: 21688135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reverse electrical remodeling by cardiac resynchronization therapy: prevalence and clinical impact.
Sebag FA; Martins RP; Defaye P; Hidden-Lucet F; Mabo P; Daubert JC; Leclercq C
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1219-27. PubMed ID: 22697464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Echocardiographic phase imaging to predict reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Buss SJ; Humpert PM; Bekeredjian R; Hardt SE; Zugck C; Schellberg D; Bauer A; Filusch A; Kuecherer H; Katus HA; Korosoglou G
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 May; 2(5):535-43. PubMed ID: 19442937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interlead distance and left ventricular lead electrical delay predict reverse remodeling during cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Merchant FM; Heist EK; Nandigam KV; Mulligan LJ; Blendea D; Riedl L; McCarty D; Orencole M; Picard MH; Ruskin JN; Singh JP
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 May; 33(5):575-82. PubMed ID: 20070543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of multisite left ventricular pacing via quadripolar lead improves acute haemodynamics and mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by radial strain speckle tracking: initial results.
Osca J; Alonso P; Cano O; Andrés A; Miro V; Tello MJ; Olagüe J; Martínez L; Salvador A
Europace; 2016 Apr; 18(4):560-7. PubMed ID: 26333378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of Frailty Assessment for Elderly Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
Kubala M; Guédon-Moreau L; Anselme F; Klug D; Bertaina G; Traullé S; Buiciuc O; Savouré A; Diouf M; Hermida JS
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Dec; 3(13):1523-1533. PubMed ID: 29759834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implantation feasibility, procedure-related adverse events and lead performance during 1-year follow-up in patients undergoing triple-site cardiac resynchronization therapy: a substudy of TRUST CRT randomized trial.
Lenarczyk R; Kowalski O; Sredniawa B; Pruszkowska-Skrzep P; Mazurek M; Jędrzejczyk-Patej E; Woźniak A; Pluta S; Głowacki J; Kalarus Z
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1228-36. PubMed ID: 22651239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
