These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28734700)
1. Predicting muscle forces during the propulsion phase of single leg triple hop test. Alvim FC; Lucareli PRG; Menegaldo LL Gait Posture; 2018 Jan; 59():298-303. PubMed ID: 28734700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kinematics and muscle forces in women with patellofemoral pain during the propulsion phase of the single leg triple hop test. Alvim FC; Muniz AMS; Lucareli PRG; Menegaldo LL Gait Posture; 2019 Sep; 73():108-115. PubMed ID: 31323618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A fair and EMG-validated comparison of recruitment criteria, musculotendon models and muscle coordination strategies, for the inverse-dynamics based optimization of muscle forces during gait. Michaud F; Lamas M; Lugrís U; Cuadrado J J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 18(1):17. PubMed ID: 33509205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contributions to the understanding of gait control. Simonsen EB Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4823. PubMed ID: 24814597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of optimisation methods and knee joint degrees of freedom on muscle force predictions during single-leg hop landings. Mokhtarzadeh H; Perraton L; Fok L; Muñoz MA; Clark R; Pivonka P; Bryant AL J Biomech; 2014 Sep; 47(12):2863-8. PubMed ID: 25129166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of electromyography-assisted modelling in estimating musculotendon forces during gait in children with cerebral palsy. Veerkamp K; Schallig W; Harlaar J; Pizzolato C; Carty CP; Lloyd DG; van der Krogt MM J Biomech; 2019 Jul; 92():45-53. PubMed ID: 31153626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-leg hop testing following fatiguing exercise: reliability and biomechanical analysis. Augustsson J; Thomeé R; Lindén C; Folkesson M; Tranberg R; Karlsson J Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2006 Apr; 16(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 16533349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ground reaction forces, kinematics, and muscle activations during the windmill softball pitch. Oliver GD; Plummer H J Sports Sci; 2011 Jul; 29(10):1071-7. PubMed ID: 21678150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frontal and transverse plane hip kinematics and gluteus maximus recruitment correlate with frontal plane knee kinematics during single-leg squat tests in women. Hollman JH; Galardi CM; Lin IH; Voth BC; Whitmarsh CL Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2014 Apr; 29(4):468-74. PubMed ID: 24467971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elevated gastrocnemius forces compensate for decreased hamstrings forces during the weight-acceptance phase of single-leg jump landing: implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury risk. Morgan KD; Donnelly CJ; Reinbolt JA J Biomech; 2014 Oct; 47(13):3295-302. PubMed ID: 25218505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modelling, simulation and optimisation of a human vertical jump. Spägele T; Kistner A; Gollhofer A J Biomech; 1999 May; 32(5):521-30. PubMed ID: 10327006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional data-tracking dynamic optimization simulations of human locomotion generated by direct collocation. Lin YC; Pandy MG J Biomech; 2017 Jul; 59():1-8. PubMed ID: 28583674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of perturbing body segment parameters on calculated joint moments and muscle forces during gait. Wesseling M; de Groote F; Jonkers I J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 24332615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hybrid neuromusculoskeletal modeling to best track joint moments using a balance between muscle excitations derived from electromyograms and optimization. Sartori M; Farina D; Lloyd DG J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(15):3613-21. PubMed ID: 25458151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How do elite ski jumpers handle the dynamic conditions in imitation jumps? Ettema G; Hooiveld J; Braaten S; Bobbert M J Sports Sci; 2016; 34(11):1081-7. PubMed ID: 26368027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of muscle forces in gait using a simulation of the electromyographic activity and numerical optimization. Ravera EP; Crespo MJ; Braidot AA Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 25408069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of trunk muscle forces, spinal loads and stability estimated by one stability- and three EMG-assisted optimization approaches. Mohammadi Y; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A Med Eng Phys; 2015 Aug; 37(8):792-800. PubMed ID: 26117333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A musculoskeletal modeling approach for estimating anterior cruciate ligament strains and knee anterior-posterior shear forces in stop-jumps performed by young recreational female athletes. Kar J; Quesada PM Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Feb; 41(2):338-48. PubMed ID: 23015067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of predicted knee-joint muscle forces during gait using an instrumented knee implant. Kim HJ; Fernandez JW; Akbarshahi M; Walter JP; Fregly BJ; Pandy MG J Orthop Res; 2009 Oct; 27(10):1326-31. PubMed ID: 19396858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging-based musculoskeletal models alter muscle and joint contact forces but do not improve the agreement with experimentally measured electromyography signals in children with cerebral palsy. Kainz H; Jonkers I Gait Posture; 2023 Feb; 100():91-95. PubMed ID: 36502666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]