These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Use of Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) as a Complementary Approach to Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for Fracture Risk Assessment in Clinical Practice. Shevroja E; Lamy O; Kohlmeier L; Koromani F; Rivadeneira F; Hans D J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):334-345. PubMed ID: 28734710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study. Dagan N; Cohen-Stavi C; Leventer-Roberts M; Balicer RD BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6755. PubMed ID: 28104610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Holloway-Kew KL; Zhang Y; Betson AG; Anderson KB; Hans D; Hyde NK; Nicholson GC; Pocock NA; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 31317250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of non-traumatic fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Beaudoin C; Moore L; Gagné M; Bessette L; Ste-Marie LG; Brown JP; Jean S Osteoporos Int; 2019 Apr; 30(4):721-740. PubMed ID: 30877348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool. Lin J; Yang Y; Fei Q; Zhang X; Ma Z; Wang Q; Li J; Li D; Meng Q; Wang B Clin Interv Aging; 2016; 11():461-9. PubMed ID: 27217730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting fracture risk in osteoporosis: the use of fracture prediction tools in an osteoporosis clinic population. Aw D; Thain J; Ali A; Aung T; Chua WM; Sahota O; Weerasuriya N; Marshall L; Kearney F; Masud T Postgrad Med J; 2016 May; 92(1087):267-70. PubMed ID: 26792635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study. Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High fracture probability with FRAX usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice. Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA; Osteoporos Int; 2012 Jan; 23(1):391-7. PubMed ID: 21365460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture risk prediction in postmenopausal women from GO Study: the comparison between FRAX, Garvan, and POL-RISK algorithms. Pluskiewicz W; Werner A; Bach M; Adamczyk P; Drozdzowska B Arch Osteoporos; 2024 May; 19(1):39. PubMed ID: 38755326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture Risk Assessment: From Population to Individual. Nguyen TV; Eisman JA J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):368-378. PubMed ID: 28729045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New horizons in fracture risk assessment. Aspray TJ Age Ageing; 2013 Sep; 42(5):548-54. PubMed ID: 23892830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of FRAX in clinical practice according to sex and osteoporosis definitions: the Manitoba BMD registry. Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Morin SN; Lix LM; Schousboe JT; Ensrud KE; Johansson H; McCloskey EV; Kanis JA Osteoporos Int; 2018 Mar; 29(3):759-767. PubMed ID: 29404625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct comparison of eight national FRAX® tools for fracture prediction and treatment qualification in Canadian women. Leslie WD; Brennan SL; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA Arch Osteoporos; 2013; 8():145. PubMed ID: 23929269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women. Bolland MJ; Siu AT; Mason BH; Horne AM; Ames RW; Grey AB; Gamble GD; Reid IR J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Feb; 26(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 20721930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of major osteoporotic and hip fractures in Australian men using FRAX scores adjusted with trabecular bone score. Holloway KL; Mohebbi M; Betson AG; Hans D; Hyde NK; Brennan-Olsen SL; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA Osteoporos Int; 2018 Jan; 29(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 28940052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture Risk Assessment Tool-Based Screening for Osteoporosis in Older Adults in Resource-Limited Settings. Stephanus AD; Ramos SCL; Netto OS; de Carvalho LSF; Campos-Staffico AM J Clin Densitom; 2024; 27(3):101494. PubMed ID: 38677082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Race/Ethnicity on United States FRAX Calculations and Treatment Qualification: A Registry-Based Study. Leslie WD; J Bone Miner Res; 2023 Dec; 38(12):1742-1748. PubMed ID: 37548387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women. Azagra R; Zwart M; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Martin-Sánchez JC; Puchol-Ruiz N; Gabriel-Escoda P; Ortiz-Alinque S; Gené E; Iglesias M; Moriña D; Diaz-Herrera MA; Utzet M; Manresa JM; BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():262. PubMed ID: 27317560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX. Kälvesten J; Lui LY; Brismar T; Cummings S Bone; 2016 May; 86():30-5. PubMed ID: 26921822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]