These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28734851)

  • 1. Regulatory accepted but out of domain: In vitro skin irritation tests for agrochemical formulations.
    Kolle SN; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Oct; 89():125-130. PubMed ID: 28734851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applicability of in vitro tests for skin irritation and corrosion to regulatory classification schemes: substantiating test strategies with data from routine studies.
    Kolle SN; Sullivan KM; Mehling A; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Dec; 64(3):402-14. PubMed ID: 22939940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test is the Method of Choice for the In Vitro Eye Irritation Testing of Agrochemical Formulations: Correlation Analysis of EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test and BCOP Test Data According to the UN GHS, US EPA and Brazil ANVISA Classification Schemes.
    Kolle SN; Rey Moreno MC; Mayer W; van Cott A; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Altern Lab Anim; 2015 Jul; 43(3):181-98. PubMed ID: 26256396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lacking applicability of in vitro eye irritation methods to identify seriously eye irritating agrochemical formulations: Results of bovine cornea opacity and permeability assay, isolated chicken eye test and the EpiOcular™ ET-50 method to classify according to UN GHS.
    Kolle SN; Van Cott A; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Apr; 85():33-47. PubMed ID: 28163171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A retrospective analysis of in vivo eye irritation, skin irritation and skin sensitisation studies with agrochemical formulations: Setting the scene for development of alternative strategies.
    Corvaro M; Gehen S; Andrews K; Chatfield R; Macleod F; Mehta J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Oct; 89():131-147. PubMed ID: 28668334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An integrated testing strategy for in vitro skin corrosion and irritation assessment using SkinEthic™ Reconstructed Human Epidermis.
    Alépée N; Grandidier MH; Tornier C; Cotovio J
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Oct; 29(7):1779-92. PubMed ID: 26187475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective evaluation of the eye irritation potential of agrochemical formulations.
    Choksi N; Latorre A; Catalano S; Grivel A; Baldassari J; Pires J; Corvaro M; Silva M; Ogasawara M; Inforzato M; Habe P; Murata R; Stinchcombe S; Kolle SN; Masinja W; Perjessy G; Daniel A; Allen D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 Jan; 146():105543. PubMed ID: 38081574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of fibrin-based dermal-epidermal organotypic cultures for in vitro skin corrosion and irritation testing of chemicals according to OECD TG 431 and 439.
    Morales M; Pérez D; Correa L; Restrepo L
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2016 Oct; 36():89-96. PubMed ID: 27448499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety.
    Graham JC; Wilt N; Costin GE; Villano C; Bader J; Krawiec L; Sly E; Gould J
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 37(4):380-390. PubMed ID: 30035615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro skin corrosion: Human skin model test - A validation study.
    Deshmukh GR; Kumar KH; Reddy PV; Rao BS
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Sep; 26(6):1072-4. PubMed ID: 22542585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Erratum to "Applicability of in vitro tests for skin irritation and corrosion to regulatory classification schemes: substantiating test strategies with data from routine studies" [Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. (2012) 402-414].
    Kolle SN; Sullivan KM; Mehling A; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Apr; 65(3):366-78. PubMed ID: 23646360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sub-categorisation of skin corrosive chemicals by the EpiSkin™ reconstructed human epidermis skin corrosion test method according to UN GHS: revision of OECD Test Guideline 431.
    Alépée N; Grandidier MH; Cotovio J;
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Mar; 28(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 24211528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human-relevant approaches to assess eye corrosion/irritation potential of agrochemical formulations.
    Clippinger AJ; Raabe HA; Allen DG; Choksi NY; van der Zalm AJ; Kleinstreuer NC; Barroso J; Lowit AB
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2021 Jun; 40(2):145-167. PubMed ID: 33830843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. KeraSkin-VM: a novel reconstructed human epidermis model for skin irritation tests.
    Jung KM; Lee SH; Jang WH; Jung HS; Heo Y; Park YH; Bae S; Lim KM; Seok SH
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Aug; 28(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 24625437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Defined approaches to classify agrochemical formulations into EPA hazard categories developed using EpiOcular
    van der Zalm AJ; Daniel AB; Raabe HA; Choksi N; Flint Silva T; Breeden-Alemi J; O'Dell L; Kleinstreuer NC; Lowit AB; Allen DG; Clippinger AJ
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2024 Mar; 43(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 37905558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative assessment of 24-hr primary skin irritation test and human patch test data with in vitro skin irritation tests according to OECD Test Guideline 439 (for quasi-drugs in Japan).
    Sugiyama M; Akita M; Alépée N; Fujishiro M; Hagino S; Handa Y; Ikeda H; Imai N; Jitsukawa S; Katoh M; Kurihara K; Kyotani D; Nomura S; Okamoto Y; Okumura H; Omori T; Sugibayashi K; Todo H; Toyoda A; Ohno Y
    J Toxicol Sci; 2018; 43(12):751-768. PubMed ID: 30518713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    Eberlin S; Facchini G; da Silva GH; Eberlin S; Bragatto AR; Pinheiro ALTA; da Silva Pinheiro A
    Altern Lab Anim; 2021 Jul; 49(4):137-146. PubMed ID: 34399588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Apparent limitations of OECD TG 431 for classification of acrylic- and methacrylic-based adhesives.
    Hoerst A; Hermann M; Mewes KR; Steinmeyer L; Buchholzer M
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2024 Feb; 94():105700. PubMed ID: 37751785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A way forward of alternative methods in China: Implementation of skin corrosivity potential using in vitro reconstructed human epidermis.
    Liu Y; Li N; Chen L; Zhong L; Zhou M; Pan L; Chen D; Gu W; Li Y; Wang W; Guo Y; Cotovio J; Qiu J; Alépée N; Cai Z
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Oct; 52():321-331. PubMed ID: 30026125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of an in vitro corrosion/irritation prediction assay using the EpiDerm skin model.
    Kidd DA; Johnson M; Clements J
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2007 Oct; 21(7):1292-7. PubMed ID: 17936572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.